Saleel Velankar
Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:21:41 -0800
Yeah doesn't this force user to relearn behavior, for no obvious benefit? On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Mark Curtis <merkin...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Just curious, what is the thought behind the change? > As in, why is it deemed better to change the order? > > > From: kw...@ubuntu.com > > To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > > Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:17:05 +0000 > > CC: bae...@gmail.com > > Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Metacity Button Order Changed > > > > > On Friday 05 March 2010 01:43:43 am John Baer wrote: > > > I noticed in today's upgrade (03/04) the order of the metacity's > > > "minimize" and "maximized" buttons changed. > > > > > > In the old metacity the order was; minimize, maximize, close > > > > > > In the new metacity the order is: maximize, minimize, close > > > > > > Is this the desired effect or is this a bug? > > > > This is the desired effect. > > > > -- > > Ken > > > > -- > > ubuntu-art mailing list > > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > > ------------------------------ > Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it > now.<http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469230/direct/01/> > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > > -- Saleel
-- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art