jcowan
Sun, 07 Dec 2003 19:07:04 -0800
Jungshik Shin scripsit: > Absolutely. The multi-level representability of Korean script > demonstrates its 'advanced' status as a script (invented only 5.5 > centuries ago, it must have been able to build upon more than 2,000 > year's history of writing system), but at the same time, has been a > continuous source of "trouble" because it's hard to agree on which level > to use.
OT question: is Korean script to some degree the product of stimulus diffusion
from Indic script of any sort? By "stimulus diffusion" I mean the reinvention
of a cultural concept (in this case, alphabetic writing) as a result of hearing
that some other culture has the concept, but without any details.
--
John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccil.org/~cowan www.reutershealth.com
"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing
on my shoulders."
--Hal Abelson