Peter Kirk
Mon, 08 Dec 2003 13:14:54 -0800
...Thank you. I thought I understood how Korean worked, but it is more complicated than I realised. I am getting closer now.
You're another 'victim'(?!) of the multi-level representability of the Korean script. Although I consistently used syllables, letters (Jamos: complex/compund vs simple/basic), it may not have been clear to you.
...
Peter, can you just open up TUS 4.0 section 3.12 (refered to by Doug in his first reply on the issue) and you would know. They're canonically equivalent and _not_ composition exclusions. If even that's not the case, it'd be really disastrous.
Jungshik
-- Peter Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) http://www.qaya.org/