gfb hjjhjh wrote: > According to the wikipedia page for the Desert alphabet, there're > critism that in the unicode chart some of the letter encoded for the > alphabet used the 1855 design instead of 1859 deisgn of those > characters. Would it be a good idea to make ​standardized variation > sequences for those characters so that they can be displayed eitherway > upon users' wish?
Almost any letter in any script can have glyph variations that don't represent a change in semantics. A Deseret font could easily, and conformantly, be constructed with whatever set of glyphs the designer wishes to show, just as it could for a Latin-script font. -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
