On 26 Mar 2017, at 18:20, Doug Ewell <d...@ewellic.org> wrote: > > Michael Everson wrote: > >> One practical consequence of changing the chart glyphs now, for instance, >> would be that it would invalidate every existing Deseret font. Adding new >> characters would not. > > I thought the chart glyphs were not normative.
Come on, Doug. The letter W is a ligature of V and V. But sure, the glyphs are only informative, so why don’t we use an OO ligature instead? Michael.
