univcity  

Re: [UC] voodoo or cockfights?

Wilma de Soto
Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:21:47 -0800

On 1/23/03 1:21 PM, "Knight, Sandra (US - Philadelphia)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> You mean to tell me that there are actually people who would condone leaving
> that animal's carcass where it was found in order to "respect" someone's
> culture?  Now I can say I have heard everything.  And I thought eschewing
> responsible medical care for one's religion was nuts.
> 
> Sande Knight
> Deloitte & Touche
> Assurance and Advisory Services
> tel  215-246-2424
> fax  215-405-3178
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Siano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:56 PM
> To: UnivCity listserv
> Subject: Re: [UC] voodoo or cockfights?
> 
> 
> Wilma de Soto wrote:
> 
>> On 1/23/03 11:40 AM, "John Ellingsworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Will it affect me if I picked it up even if I don't believe in voodoo or
>>> Santeria?
>>> What about the disposal person?  Will they be affected?  Should an
> exorcism
>>> be performed on it?
>>> Or should we just leave it in the park?
>>> 
>> I realize you are being tongue-in-cheek here, but for adherents to these
>> practices, it is a serious matter.
>> 
>> Frankly, I cannot be certain if being a believer makes one more susceptible
>> but my guess would be yes.  In all probability this was an offering to the
>> Orichas, if you interfere with it, well...it's not a good thing whether you
>> are a believer or not.  The rule of thumb is that what you are not involved
>> with, let it be.
>> 
> I am completely out of sympathy with Wilma's comments. For one thing,
> this is a dead animal John found: regardless of whatever "ritual" was
> involved in leaving it there, it could become a health hazard. Corpses
> attract carrion-eaters, insects and parasites. Fleas vacate the corpse,
> and they gotta go _somewhere_. (n other words, at the very least, that
> corpse has to be disposed of.
> 
> And it's probably not a nice thing for a small child to discover,
> either. Let's say you left it there out of "respect" for whatever ritual
> you suppose was involved. So this dead, decapitated animal's laying in a
> park, and while you're congratulating youself on your tolerance for
> strange and colorful cultures, Mom brings out her pre-schoolers for some
> fresh air and maybe some wintertime activity on the swings. So not only
> do the kids _find_ this thing, but now they have to imagine that there
> are people in their neighborhood who _murder animals_ because they
> belong to some _weird religious cult_.
> 
> Look at it this way. Let's say that one of us found a decapitated
> rooster dumped not in Clark Park, but our front yard. I don't think any
> of us would think, "Well, it was probably one of those religious
> practices of one of those other cultures. After all, it's a place with
> shrubs and grass, it's a small patch of nature, and it was done as an
> offering to the Orichas." I think our first thought would be "Who the
> hell'd dump a dead animal in MY front yard?" And I think our second
> thought'd be "Is this some kind of bizarre _threat?_ Is someone trying
> to chase me out of the neighborhood?" And I think our third thought
> would involve filing a police report of some sort.
> 
>> I am of the opinion that all people's religious observances should be
>> treated respectfully whether or not I agree with them.
>> 
> It'd be interesting to see if Wilma'd extend such tolerance to, say, the
> Christian Identity movement.
> 
> 
> ----
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
> list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
> <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
> This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
> intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If
> you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message.  Any
> disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any
> action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
> ----
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
> list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
> <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
I said that I would not disturb it if I thought it were used in that manner.
If you feel you should move it, by all means do so.

A question was posed as to whether this rooster that was found was part of a
cockfight or a voodoo rite?  I answered the question as best I could and
said I would rather not disturb it.  I am not imposing this view upon any
others.

It is your choice but I would rather not do it.

Wilma

----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.