Kimm Tynan
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:24:40 -0800
Looks like you uncheck the box next to the list you want to unsubscribe from.
On 1/25/10 10:50 AM, "Mike Lazenka" <laze...@isc.upenn.edu> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've asked for instructions for unsubscribing to this list. A URL has > appeared on recent posts that says "." To unsubscribe or for archive > information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>". > > When visiting that link the first message to appear is the always > re-assuring:"list.purple.com uses an invalid security certificate" Allowing > the exception brings me to an admin menu with no clear instructions on how to > unsubscribe. I can browse to see which lists I'm subscribed to, but upon > reaching that search result, there are again no instructions or clear > indication of how to unsubscribe. > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > ML > > Michael C Lazenka > laze...@upenn.edu > > "Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the > sunlight." Benjamin Franklin > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-univc...@list.purple.com [mailto:owner-univc...@list.purple.com] > Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 4:15 AM > To: univcity-dig...@news.villanova.edu > Subject: univcity-digest V1 #1537 > > univcity-digest Saturday, January 23 2010 Volume 01 : Number 1537 > > > > In this issue: > > [UC] The supreme court attacks the people > Re: [UC] The supreme court attacks the people > [UC] Dog groomer > [UC] Penn incompetence > Re: [UC] The supreme court attacks the people > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:33:17 -0500 (EST) > From: Glenn moyer <glen...@earthlink.net> > Subject: [UC] The supreme court attacks the people > > Well it's official now, corporatocracy. Those who study totalitarian shifts > point out that once the "point of no return" is crossed, things move rapidly. > Being an optimist by nature, I had been holding on to hope. > > Those who only get information through corporate media probably didn't know > that this was coming to the corporate court. This was the big one! > > > http://www.philly.com/inquirer/world_us/20100122_Justices_shift_campaign-finan > ce_rules.html > > > http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/americandebate/Nary_a_peep_of_protest.html > - ---- > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:19:14 -0500 > From: Richard Moreau <ric...@mac.com> > Subject: Re: [UC] The supreme court attacks the people > > I've always found it interesting that the tallest building in a > community speaks to who holds the power. > > In colonial (U.S.) days church steeples were the tallest, so people > could find them over (New England) hill and dale. > > Then City Hall, at least in Philadelphia, was the tallest by > 'gentlemen's' agreement, speaking to the unifying power of a > government of the people, for the people and by the people. > > The Empire State Building arguably spoke to the power of television. > > The Sears (now Willis?) Tower spoke to the power of retail and > consumption. (Willis is a law firm? Hmm.) > > In Philadelphia, Liberty Place was eventually built, its main tenant > being an insurance company, Cigna, speaking to the economic needs of > the community to promote business through real estate development in a > city that hadn't previously been very competitive in the national > marketplace. (And shouldn't an insurance company's money be going to > cover people in times of need, not building fancy buildings?) > > The World Trade Center and nearly 3000 of its occupants were > obliterated by an organization that uses violence and fear to get what > it wants. Not to mention the damage done to the headquarters of > arguably the most powerful military in the world. > > Now we have Comcast (& soon NBC-Universal) with the tallest building > in town, speaking to the rise (and consolidation) of the media, the > internet, and communication more generally. > > We're seeing internet giant Google take on China in a way that few > countries have dared, and risk-taking big banks and mortgage companies > threaten national and international economies, costing people their > homes, jobs, and health care. HUP continues to build highly > specialized and expensive facilities on land that had housed a Civic > Center and a hospital for the poor. (While the Convention - not Civic > - - Center expansion, and the now nearly empty Gallery and, before that, > the "Chinese Wall" strangles Chinatown. Penn Center office buildings > symbolically and literally send rail travel under ground. Penn builds > a park (for now) and mixed use buildings on land that was used by an > organization that delivers snail mail by hand, door to door - > something that may soon seem like the Pony Express does to us now. > Home Depot controls the world lumber market. A McDonald's hamburger is > said to cost an acre of rain forest (so the cattle can graze.) A > developer of what we know not yet, tears down a shelter for survivors > of domestic violence and plows under a community garden in our own > neighborhood so the land can sit unused behind a cyclone fence until > when? Market conditions improve? We get so tired of the empty lot that > we'll accept any building / use instead? > > Okay, I'm straying from my point about the height of a building > speaking to its owner's power; maybe now it's more about the number of > buildings? Or maybe my argument should be more about land use and > power. But now an even taller building, the tallest in the U.S., I > think, is planned for 18th and Arch, though I don't know who its main > tenant will be. Anyone want to take a guess as to who the next > powerful force in our culture will be? Maybe that's where one of the > casinos will end up, since we seem to have lost so much of our faith > in hard work bearing fruitful results; now we have to rely on luck and > chance. (Or am I just channeling my feelings about Haiti.) > > Tying this back to Glenn's post, the Supreme Court is a rather short > building. Hmm. > > I should add too that I say some of this with judgment, but some > without, just as observation. Who knows, maybe HUP will discover a > cure for cancer on the former site of Philadelphia General Hospital. > Maybe a free art museum will end up at 43rd and Baltimore? People > point to the spread of Tibetan Buddhism, something I admire, as being > due to the otherwise terrible circumstances of China's invasion and > takeover. In other words, it's never easy to predict the outcome of a > change or an action. But I find it always interesting, like some find > the weather to be. Maybe, however, it's all just distraction and Babel. > > - - Ricky > > > On Jan 22, 2010, at 9:33 AM, Glenn moyer <glen...@earthlink.net> wrote: > >> > Well it's official now, corporatocracy. Those who study >> > totalitarian shifts point out that once the "point of no return" is >> > crossed, things move rapidly. Being an optimist by nature, I had >> > been holding on to hope. >> > >> > Those who only get information through corporate media probably >> > didn't know that this was coming to the corporate court. This was >> > the big one! >> > >> > >> > >> http://www.philly.com/inquirer/world_us/20100122_Justices_shift_campaign-fina >> nce_rules.html >> > >> > >> > >> http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/americandebate/Nary_a_peep_of_protest.html >> > ---- >> > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the >> > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see >> > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. > - ---- > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:34:42 -0500 > From: Stephen Gallagher <stephentgallag...@gmail.com> > Subject: [UC] Dog groomer > > - --0050450158d71a8f5c047dc43c67 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Does anyone have a recommendation for a dog groomer in general or > 'specialist' groomers that either come to your home to do the grooming and > that deal with Sheep dogs? > > Thanks for any input. > > - --0050450158d71a8f5c047dc43c67 > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Does anyone have a recommendation for a dog groomer in general or=A0 's= > pecialist' groomers that either come to your home to do the grooming an= > d that deal with Sheep dogs?<br><br>Thanks for any input.<br> > > - --0050450158d71a8f5c047dc43c67-- > - ---- > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:26:52 -0500 > From: Frank <fcarr...@pobox.com> > Subject: [UC] Penn incompetence > > Apparently, Penn's Department of Public Safety didn't think that a man = > who had just shot two people being at-large in the campus and = > neighborhood wasn't an "immediate threat to the health or safety of = > students and employees." Really? > > http://thedp.com/article/u-defends-lack-alert-shooting > > Frank= > - ---- > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:39:17 -0500 (EST) > From: Glenn moyer <glen...@earthlink.net> > Subject: Re: [UC] The supreme court attacks the people > > Ricky, > > You still need to pull all of this information together to make your point. > I've noticed that lots of people are being pulled by different emotions > lately. Me too! But it's much better to open up than to be fearful like way > too many of our neighbors! I'd like to hear your thoughts focused on these > statements-- > > > "A McDonald's hamburger is >> >said to cost an acre of rain forest (so the cattle can graze.) A >> >developer of what we know not yet, tears down a shelter for survivors >> >of domestic violence and plows under a community garden in our own >> >neighborhood so the land can sit unused behind a cyclone fence until >> >when? Market conditions improve? > > The true cost of meat is a very important global and health issue! > > As to the local situation, our community leaders decided to help destroy our > right to know important issues. When we accept back room deals because we > believe that benefits will trickle down, the other questions can't be easily > answered. > > Peace and good will to all, > Glenn > > > > > > > - -----Original Message----- >> >From: Richard Moreau <ric...@mac.com> >> >Sent: Jan 22, 2010 11:19 AM >> >To: Univ City Listserv <univcity@list.purple.com> >> >Subject: Re: [UC] The supreme court attacks the people >> > >> >I've always found it interesting that the tallest building in a >> >community speaks to who holds the power. >> > >> >In colonial (U.S.) days church steeples were the tallest, so people >> >could find them over (New England) hill and dale. >> > >> >Then City Hall, at least in Philadelphia, was the tallest by >> >'gentlemen's' agreement, speaking to the unifying power of a >> >government of the people, for the people and by the people. >> > >> >The Empire State Building arguably spoke to the power of television. >> > >> >The Sears (now Willis?) Tower spoke to the power of retail and >> >consumption. (Willis is a law firm? Hmm.) >> > >> >In Philadelphia, Liberty Place was eventually built, its main tenant >> >being an insurance company, Cigna, speaking to the economic needs of >> >the community to promote business through real estate development in a >> >city that hadn't previously been very competitive in the national >> >marketplace. (And shouldn't an insurance company's money be going to >> >cover people in times of need, not building fancy buildings?) >> > >> >The World Trade Center and nearly 3000 of its occupants were >> >obliterated by an organization that uses violence and fear to get what >> >it wants. Not to mention the damage done to the headquarters of >> >arguably the most powerful military in the world. >> > >> >Now we have Comcast (& soon NBC-Universal) with the tallest building >> >in town, speaking to the rise (and consolidation) of the media, the >> >internet, and communication more generally. >> > >> >We're seeing internet giant Google take on China in a way that few >> >countries have dared, and risk-taking big banks and mortgage companies >> >threaten national and international economies, costing people their >> >homes, jobs, and health care. HUP continues to build highly >> >specialized and expensive facilities on land that had housed a Civic >> >Center and a hospital for the poor. (While the Convention - not Civic >> >- Center expansion, and the now nearly empty Gallery and, before that, >> >the "Chinese Wall" strangles Chinatown. Penn Center office buildings >> >symbolically and literally send rail travel under ground. Penn builds >> >a park (for now) and mixed use buildings on land that was used by an >> >organization that delivers snail mail by hand, door to door - >> >something that may soon seem like the Pony Express does to us now. >> >Home Depot controls the world lumber market. A McDonald's hamburger is >> >said to cost an acre of rain forest (so the cattle can graze.) A >> >developer of what we know not yet, tears down a shelter for survivors >> >of domestic violence and plows under a community garden in our own >> >neighborhood so the land can sit unused behind a cyclone fence until >> >when? Market conditions improve? We get so tired of the empty lot that >> >we'll accept any building / use instead? >> > >> >Okay, I'm straying from my point about the height of a building >> >speaking to its owner's power; maybe now it's more about the number of >> >buildings? Or maybe my argument should be more about land use and >> >power. But now an even taller building, the tallest in the U.S., I >> >think, is planned for 18th and Arch, though I don't know who its main >> >tenant will be. Anyone want to take a guess as to who the next >> >powerful force in our culture will be? Maybe that's where one of the >> >casinos will end up, since we seem to have lost so much of our faith >> >in hard work bearing fruitful results; now we have to rely on luck and >> >chance. (Or am I just channeling my feelings about Haiti.) >> > >> >Tying this back to Glenn's post, the Supreme Court is a rather short >> >building. Hmm. >> > >> >I should add too that I say some of this with judgment, but some >> >without, just as observation. Who knows, maybe HUP will discover a >> >cure for cancer on the former site of Philadelphia General Hospital. >> >Maybe a free art museum will end up at 43rd and Baltimore? People >> >point to the spread of Tibetan Buddhism, something I admire, as being >> >due to the otherwise terrible circumstances of China's invasion and >> >takeover. In other words, it's never easy to predict the outcome of a >> >change or an action. But I find it always interesting, like some find >> >the weather to be. Maybe, however, it's all just distraction and Babel. >> > >> >- Ricky >> > >> > >> >On Jan 22, 2010, at 9:33 AM, Glenn moyer <glen...@earthlink.net> wrote: >> > >>> >> Well it's official now, corporatocracy. Those who study >>> >> totalitarian shifts point out that once the "point of no return" is >>> >> crossed, things move rapidly. Being an optimist by nature, I had >>> >> been holding on to hope. >>> >> >>> >> Those who only get information through corporate media probably >>> >> didn't know that this was coming to the corporate court. This was >>> >> the big one! >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> http://www.philly.com/inquirer/world_us/20100122_Justices_shift_campaign-fin >>> ance_rules.html >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/americandebate/Nary_a_peep_of_protest.html >>> >> ---- >>> >> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the >>> >> list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see >>> >> <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. >> >---- >> >You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the >> >list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see >> ><http://www.purple.com/list.html>. > > - ---- > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. > > ------------------------------ > > End of univcity-digest V1 #1537 > ******************************* > > ---- > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the > list named "UnivCity-digest." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. > ---- > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.