One more question.why the  # of racks should be equal to RF? 

For example,we have 4 machines,each virtualized to 8 vms ,can we set 4 RACs 
with RF3?I mean one machine one RAC.


Thanks


------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "我自己的邮箱";<2535...@qq.com>;
发送时间: 2017年7月26日(星期三) 上午10:32
收件人: "user"<user@cassandra.apache.org>; 
抄送: "anujw_2...@yahoo.co.in"<anujw_2...@yahoo.co.in>; 
主题: 回复: 回复: tolerate how many nodes down in the cluster



Thanks for the remind,we will setup a new DC as suggested.




------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "kurt greaves";<k...@instaclustr.com>;
发送时间: 2017年7月26日(星期三) 上午10:30
收件人: "User"<user@cassandra.apache.org>; 
抄送: "anujw_2...@yahoo.co.in"<anujw_2...@yahoo.co.in>; 
主题: Re: 回复: tolerate how many nodes down in the cluster



Keep in mind that you shouldn't just enable multiple racks on an existing 
cluster (this will lead to massive inconsistencies). The best method is to 
migrate to a new DC as Brooke mentioned.​

Reply via email to