There was an issue with parsing with non-EN locales. Now fixed, try
again with latest head.
On 14/05/2014 17:35, Hans Schwäbli wrote:
I quickly tested the lifecycle.
Story:
Lebenszyklus:
Vorher:
Gegeben im Lager sind 100 T-Shirts
Nach:
Ergebnis: ERFOLG
Gegeben im Lager sind 200 T-Shirts
Ergebnis: IRGENDWELCHE
Gegeben im Lager sind 300 T-Shirts
Ergebnis: AUSFALL
Gegeben im Lager sind 400 T-Shirts
Szenario: Versandkosten fallen weg
Wenn ein Kunde 20 T-Shirts bestellt
Dann betragen die Versandkosten 7,5 Euro
Result is:
Lebenszyklus:
Vorher:
Gegeben im Lager sind 100 T-Shirts
Nach:
Ergebnis: IRGENDWELCHE
Gegeben im Lager sind 200 T-Shirts
Gegeben im Lager sind 300 T-Shirts
Gegeben im Lager sind 400 T-Shirts
Szenario: Versandkosten fallen weg
Gegeben im Lager sind 100 T-Shirts
Wenn ein Kunde 20 T-Shirts bestellt
Dann betragen die Versandkosten 7,5 Euro
Gegeben im Lager sind 200 T-Shirts
Gegeben im Lager sind 300 T-Shirts
Gegeben im Lager sind 400 T-Shirts
It does not work as I expect it since it executes all three after
steps although it should only execute the one for "Ergebnis: ERFOLG"
(Outcome: SUCCESS).
On Friday or next week I can test that a bit more thoroughly.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Mauro Talevi
<mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org <mailto:mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org>> wrote:
Cool, we'll push out new beta soon.
Can you also take the Lifecycle After upon outcome functionality
for a spin while you're at it?
On 13/05/2014 13:42, Hans Schwäbli wrote:
I mixed up snapshot versions with beta-versions, sorry.
I tried now the snapshot version and it works now as expected
concerning the problem with the examples table.
Thank you!
But there is a problem with comments. I will write a posting just
on that.
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Mauro Talevi
<mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org <mailto:mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org>>
wrote:
No, a new beta has not been deployed yet. In the meantime,
you can use the latest 3.9.x or build the 4.0 snapshot from
source.
On 8 May 2014, at 08:59, Hans Schwäbli
<bugs.need.love....@gmail.com
<mailto:bugs.need.love....@gmail.com>> wrote:
Thank you! Is it also deployed?
I did not find it here:
https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/public/org/jbehave/jbehave-core/4.0-beta-7/
The last snapshot there is from 2nd of May.
The same snapshot date is on:
http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.jbehave/jbehave-maven-plugin/4.0-beta-7/
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Mauro Talevi
<mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org
<mailto:mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org>> wrote:
This issue is now fixed in head of 4.x branch. It did
not apply to 3.x.
On 07/05/2014 10:55, Hans Schwäbli wrote:
I created such an example for jbehave-core now and
attached it to this posting. I still cannot work on a
clone the Github project because of company
restrictions (I haven't yet received an answer why it
is not working inside the company proxy).
In case the mailing list does not support attachments I
have also sent them directly to Mauro.
To reproduce it you will need this in the Maven pom.xml:
<metaFilters>
<metaFilter>*+component order -skip*</metaFilter>
</metaFilters>
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Hans Schwäbli
<bugs.need.love....@gmail.com
<mailto:bugs.need.love....@gmail.com>> wrote:
I committed it here:
https://github.com/OttoDiesel/jbehave-shop-example.git
I will add such a scenario to the core examples.
Until then you could use that other example if you
like. It is the example for the article on JBehave
by the way.
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Mauro Talevi
<mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org
<mailto:mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org>> wrote:
Yes, it looks likely to be unrelated to given
stories and such.
Could you please add a scenario reproducing the
behaviour to the meta_filtering.story in the
core examples (preferably in English)?
Does it work with 3.x?
On 06/05/2014 11:34, Hans Schwäbli wrote:
I already use
StoryControls.doIgnoreMetaFiltersIfGivenStory(true).
And I removed the given story in the story.
But the result is the same.
Maybe tomorrow I can commit the whole project,
so that you can reproduce it.
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Stephen de
Vries <stephe...@gmail.com
<mailto:stephe...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 6 May 2014, at 10:51, Hans Schwäbli
<bugs.need.love....@gmail.com
<mailto:bugs.need.love....@gmail.com>> wrote:
I have the example story, see below. It
runs not as expected when filtering by:
+Komponente Bestellung -Skip
VorgegebeneStories:
shop/stories/Login.story
My guess is that the given story doesn’t
have the same meta-tags. Fix is to set:
StoryControls.doIgnoreMetaFiltersIfGivenStory(true)
See:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JBEHAVE-789
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
