Hi Clement and also Richard,
I was able to remove @Requires, I was already populating my own list luckily
so removing the @Requires array didn't break a thing.
I did have to set the aggregate option to true in the bind annotation
eg: @Bind(aggregate=true, id="tidgets")
because I would only have one tidget be bound, and only until i decided to
close the bundle waiting on tidgets did the rest load. aggregate fixed this,
all the tidgets loaded correctly in the beginning and if any additional
tidgets were added. This didn't quite solve my original problem, but I now
believe the problem is not with this, but a @Publisher, @Subscriber setup I
have. I will make a new post once I have more information.
Thanks to both of you for your help.
Mark-Anthony Hutton
clement escoffier wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 11.08.2010, at 19:17, mhutton86 wrote:
>
> There is several way to fix this issue:
>
> 1) Richard's idea (removing the @Requires)
> @Bind(id="tidget_devices", optional="true", filter="(...)"
> and
> @Unbind(id="tidget_devices")
>
> In the method, populate your own list.
>
> 2) Using your current code but without adding the services inside the list
> Indeed, they are already injected by iPOJO, you don't need to add them to
> the list. Moreover, iPOJO checks that each matching service are injected
> only once in the list.
> So,
> @Requires TidgetSaasmDevice[] devices;
> @Bind(id=......)
> public void bind(TidgetSaasmDevice device) {
> // 'device' is already present in the devices list.
> }
>
> The devices array does not only contain initial values but all current
> matching services.
>
> Regards,
>
> Clement
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/%40requires-with-late-binding-headaches-tp29410576p29419552.html
Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
