Dear Davor, There is also an alternative solution for SMPP Server i.e. vsmppbox ,which has more features compared to other smpp servers.you can find the details of that in http://www.evoxtel.com
> On 22-Sep-2016, at 7:32 PM, Stipe Tolj <st...@kannel.org> wrote: > > Am 21.09.2016 08:25, schrieb Davor Spasoski: >> Hi, >> >> I realized yesterday that the reason the allowed/preferred trickery >> doesn’t work is because opensmppbox doesn’t pass smsc-id dynamically. >> It’s either a static value using the route-to-smsc directive or it’s >> blank if this is omitted. The whole point of my usecase was to have >> different ESMEs routed to different smscs and all that by using a single >> opensmpp instance (IP/port) due to specific circumstances of the case I >> need to solve. >> >> AFAICS, for this to work it needs development. > > Hi Davor, > > correct, the opensmppbox isn't able to handle such routing internally. For > the purposes you intend to it's more suitable to use the commercial Kannel > SMPP v5.0 server (smppbox), which is a true virtual SMSC solution allowing > the same connection scheme, but with a major benefit in configuration ability > and flexibility. > > Please let me know if you would like to hear more details and we can arrange > for a test-drive on your own system to get going. > > -- > Best Regards, > Stipe Tolj > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany > > Kannel Foundation tolj.org system architecture > http://www.kannel.org/ http://www.tolj.org/ > > stolj at kannel.org st at tolj.org > ------------------------------------------------------------------- >
