users  

Messages by Date

• 2012/04/12 Re: New versions of Perl are slower xTrade Assessory
• 2012/04/11 Re: New versions of Perl are slower Julian Yap
• 2012/04/11 Re: New versions of Perl are slower Lee Dilkie
• 2012/04/11 Re: Spam from Moniker Privacy Services. Frank Chan
• 2012/04/11 Re: New versions of Perl are slower Julian Yap
• 2012/04/11 Re: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SpamCop Simon Loewenthal
• 2012/04/11 Re: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SpamCop Benny Pedersen
• 2012/04/11 Re: new / tests to verify Benny Pedersen
• 2012/04/11 Re: New versions of Perl are slower Michael Scheidell
• 2012/04/11 Re: New versions of Perl are slower Julian Yap
• 2012/04/11 Re: spamc/spamd SSL issues Kevin A. McGrail
• 2012/04/11 Re: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SpamCop Simon Loewenthal
• 2012/04/11 Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SpamCop Simon Loewenthal
• 2012/04/11 Re: New versions of Perl are slower Kevin A. McGrail
• 2012/04/10 Re: New versions of Perl are slower xTrade Assessory
• 2012/04/10 Re: New versions of Perl are slower Lee Dilkie
• 2012/04/10 Re: New versions of Perl are slower Julian Yap
• 2012/04/10 Re: New versions of Perl are slower Michael Parker
• 2012/04/10 Re: New versions of Perl are slower Michael Scheidell
• 2012/04/10 Re: New versions of Perl are slower Julian Yap
• 2012/04/10 Re: "Pill" spams Rob McEwen
• 2012/04/10 Re: New versions of Perl are slower Michael Scheidell
• 2012/04/10 Re: "Pill" spams RW
• 2012/04/10 Re: "Pill" spams Rob McEwen
• 2012/04/10 spamc/spamd SSL issues Trey Nolen
• 2012/04/10 New versions of Perl are slower Julian Yap
• 2012/04/10 Re: new / tests to verify Axb
• 2012/04/10 Re: new / tests to verify Kevin A. McGrail
• 2012/04/10 new / tests to verify McGranahan, Jamen
• 2012/04/10 Re: "Pill" spams Axb
• 2012/04/10 --rebuild and --no-rebuild Mauricio Tavares
• 2012/04/10 Re: "Pill" spams John Hardin
• 2012/04/10 Re: "Pill" spams Rob McEwen
• 2012/04/10 Re: "Pill" spams Thomas Johnson
• 2012/04/10 Re: "Pill" spams Thomas Johnson
• 2012/04/10 Re: Invalid Date: header (not RFC 2822) corpus.defero
• 2012/04/10 Invalid Date: header (not RFC 2822) corpus.defero
• 2012/04/10 Re: "Pill" spams Bowie Bailey
• 2012/04/10 Re: meta rules assistance Benny Pedersen
• 2012/04/10 Re: meta rules assistance RW
• 2012/04/10 Re: Malware flagging Axb
• 2012/04/10 Malware flagging joea
• 2012/04/10 Re: meta rules assistance Swati R
• 2012/04/10 meta rules assistance Tom Kinghorn
• 2012/04/09 Re: "Pill" spams Alex
• 2012/04/09 "Pill" spams Thomas Johnson
• 2012/04/09 Re: Regex help (targetting very long HTML comments) Kris Deugau
• 2012/04/09 Re: Flag mail from certain country codes. Benny Pedersen
• 2012/04/09 Rules for empty email body Swati R
• 2012/04/09 Re: Flag mail from certain country codes. Mariusz Kruk
• 2012/04/08 Re: Flag mail from certain country codes. Martin Gregorie
• 2012/04/08 Flag mail from certain country codes. joea
• 2012/04/08 Re: Marking very similar messages as spam... John Hardin
• 2012/04/08 Re: Marking very similar messages as spam... Eliezer Croitoru
• 2012/04/08 Marking very similar messages as spam... calebgray
• 2012/04/06 Re: Regex help (targetting very long HTML comments) Henrik K
• 2012/04/06 Re: Regex help (targetting very long HTML comments) Henrik K
• 2012/04/06 Re: Regex help (targetting very long HTML comments) Adam Katz
• 2012/04/06 Re: Bayes_ignore Adam Katz
• 2012/04/05 Re: attachment scan using spamassassin Benny Pedersen
• 2012/04/04 Re: Missed SPAM John Hardin
• 2012/04/04 Re: Missed SPAM Frank Chan
• 2012/04/04 Re: Missed SPAM Jason Haar
• 2012/04/04 Re: FreeBSD ports users: Q: Value in SA 3.4? Kevin A. McGrail
• 2012/04/04 Re: FreeBSD ports users: Q: Value in SA 3.4? Michael Scheidell
• 2012/04/04 FreeBSD ports users: Q: Value in SA 3.4? Michael Scheidell
• 2012/04/03 Re: Regex help (targetting very long HTML comments) Henrik K
• 2012/04/03 Re: Regex help (targetting very long HTML comments) Kris Deugau
• 2012/04/03 Re: Regex help (targetting very long HTML comments) Henrik K
• 2012/04/03 Re: Regex help (targetting very long HTML comments) Henrik K
• 2012/04/03 Re: Regex help (targetting very long HTML comments) Kris Deugau
• 2012/04/03 Re: Regex help (targetting very long HTML comments) David F. Skoll
• 2012/04/03 Re: Regex help (targetting very long HTML comments) Bowie Bailey
• 2012/04/02 Re: Regex help (targetting very long HTML comments) Kris Deugau
• 2012/04/02 Re: Request to change rule RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED Michael Scheidell
• 2012/04/02 Re: Regex help (targetting very long HTML comments) Bowie Bailey
• 2012/04/02 Re: Regex help (targetting very long HTML comments) Stephane Chazelas
• 2012/04/02 Regex help (targetting very long HTML comments) Kris Deugau
• 2012/04/02 Re: Request to change rule RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED Bowie Bailey
• 2012/04/02 Re: Bayes_ignore John ffitch
• 2012/04/01 Bayes_ignore joea
• 2012/03/31 Re: Request to change rule RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED Fortney, James T - CSCCS
• 2012/03/31 Re: Missed SPAM joea
• 2012/03/31 Re: Missed SPAM RW
• 2012/03/31 Re: Missed SPAM John Hardin
• 2012/03/31 Re: Missed SPAM Jari Fredriksson
• 2012/03/31 Re: Missed SPAM Jeremy McSpadden
• 2012/03/31 Re: Missed SPAM joea
• 2012/03/31 Re: Missed SPAM Michael Scheidell
• 2012/03/31 Re: Missed SPAM joea
• 2012/03/30 Re: Missed SPAM John Hardin
• 2012/03/30 Missed SPAM joea
• 2012/03/30 Re: Spam from Moniker Privacy Services. Frank Chan
• 2012/03/30 Re: Spam from Moniker Privacy Services. Frank Chan
• 2012/03/30 Re: spam report help Dave Warren
• 2012/03/30 Re: Spam from Moniker Privacy Services. Robert Schetterer
• 2012/03/30 Re: Request to change rule RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED Kevin A. McGrail
• 2012/03/30 Re: Request to change rule RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED Bowie Bailey
• 2012/03/30 Re: Request to change rule RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED Axb
• 2012/03/30 Re: Request to change rule RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED Kevin A. McGrail
• 2012/03/30 Re: Request to change rule RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED Kevin A. McGrail
• 2012/03/30 Re: Spam from Moniker Privacy Services. Richard Doyle
• 2012/03/30 Re: spam report help Bowie Bailey
• 2012/03/30 Re: Request to change rule RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED Michael Scheidell
• 2012/03/30 Re: Request to change rule RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED Michael Scheidell
• 2012/03/30 Re: spam report help Benny Pedersen
• 2012/03/30 Re: spam report help Tom Kinghorn
• 2012/03/30 Re: spam report help Benny Pedersen
• 2012/03/30 spam report help Tom Kinghorn
• 2012/03/29 Re: Request to change rule RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED Dave Warren
• 2012/03/29 Re: My Mad Plan's Achillies heel? Benny Pedersen
• 2012/03/29 Re: No spam, but get quarantined. FC Mario Patty
• 2012/03/29 Re: Spam from Moniker Privacy Services. Frank Chan
• 2012/03/29 Re: My Mad Plan's Achillies heel? John Hardin
• 2012/03/29 Re: My Mad Plan's Achillies heel? j...@j4computers.com
• 2012/03/29 Re: My Mad Plan's Achillies heel? j...@j4computers.com
• 2012/03/29 Re: My Mad Plan's Achillies heel? John Hardin
• 2012/03/29 Re: My Mad Plan's Achillies heel? j...@j4computers.com
• 2012/03/29 Re: Request to change rule RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED Kevin A. McGrail
• 2012/03/29 Request to change rule RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED Michael Scheidell
• 2012/03/28 Re: cumulating dyn dns rules Benny Pedersen
• 2012/03/28 Re: cumulating dyn dns rules Benny Pedersen
• 2012/03/28 Re: My Mad Plan's Achillies heel? Michael Scheidell
• 2012/03/28 My Mad Plan's Achillies heel? j...@j4computers.com
• 2012/03/28 Re: No spam, but get quarantined. Martin Hepworth
• 2012/03/28 Re: cumulating dyn dns rules Stephane Chazelas
• 2012/03/28 Re: cumulating dyn dns rules Axb
• 2012/03/28 Re: cumulating dyn dns rules Kevin A. McGrail
• 2012/03/28 cumulating dyn dns rules Stephane Chazelas
• 2012/03/28 Re: WhiteList an IP address? Benny Pedersen
• 2012/03/28 Re: WhiteList an IP address? Bowie Bailey
• 2012/03/28 Re: Rule to catch similar localparts in "To:" recipients? Kevin A. McGrail
• 2012/03/28 Re: WhiteList an IP address? FC Mario Patty
• 2012/03/27 Re: No spam, but get quarantined. FC Mario Patty
• 2012/03/27 Re: WhiteList an IP address? Benny Pedersen
• 2012/03/27 Re: No spam, but get quarantined. Martin Hepworth
• 2012/03/27 WhiteList an IP address? ddodell
• 2012/03/27 Rule to catch similar localparts in "To:" recipients? Dave Pooser
• 2012/03/27 Re: sa-update Martin Gregorie
• 2012/03/27 Re: having trouble running spamassassin from command line to test rules. Bowie Bailey
• 2012/03/27 Re: sa-update Jari Fredriksson
• 2012/03/27 Re: sought is failing with sa-compile darxus
• 2012/03/27 sought is failing with sa-compile Benny Pedersen
• 2012/03/27 Re: submitting samples Axb
• 2012/03/27 Re: submitting samples - empty link j...@j4computers.com
• 2012/03/27 Re: submitting samples j...@j4computers.com
• 2012/03/27 submitting samples j...@j4computers.com
• 2012/03/27 Re: sa-update RW
• 2012/03/27 Re: sa-update xTrade Assessory
• 2012/03/27 Re: sa-update j...@j4computers.com
• 2012/03/27 Re: sa-update j...@j4computers.com
• 2012/03/26 Re: sa-update Duane Hill
• 2012/03/26 Re: sa-update Jeremy McSpadden
• 2012/03/26 sa-update j...@j4computers.com
• 2012/03/26 Re: Blocking obfuscated pharma subjects David F. Skoll
• 2012/03/26 Re: is there a rule that could count CC or BCC emails? Piotr Kloc
• 2012/03/26 Re: is there a rule that could count CC or BCC emails? Piotr Kloc
• 2012/03/26 Re: is there a rule that could count CC or BCC emails? Kevin A. McGrail
• 2012/03/26 Re: is there a rule that could count CC or BCC emails? Sergio
• 2012/03/26 Re: is there a rule that could count CC or BCC emails? Kevin A. McGrail
• 2012/03/26 is there a rule that could count CC or BCC emails? Sergio
• 2012/03/26 Re: Quick question about enabling a private rules in the local.cf RW
• 2012/03/26 Re: spamfilter:dummy - not found Ralf Hildebrandt
• 2012/03/26 Re: Quick question about enabling a private rules in the local.cf Simon Loewenthal
• 2012/03/26 Re: spamfilter:dummy - not found j...@j4computers.com
• 2012/03/26 Re: spamfilter:dummy - not found Ralf Hildebrandt
• 2012/03/26 spamfilter:dummy - not found j...@j4computers.com
• 2012/03/25 Re: Mangled headers? j...@j4computers.com
• 2012/03/25 Mangled headers? j...@j4computers.com
• 2012/03/24 Re: Want help to create a rule for filtering mails with empty message body and attachments John Hardin
• 2012/03/24 Re: Want help to create a rule for filtering mails with empty message body and attachments RW
• 2012/03/24 Re: Want help to create a rule for filtering mails with empty message body and attachments Michael Scheidell
• 2012/03/24 Re: strange problem here with spam detection RW
• 2012/03/24 Re: Want help to create a rule for filtering mails with empty message body and attachments Swati Rananaware
• 2012/03/23 Want help to create a rule for filtering mails with empty message body and attachments Swati Rananaware
• 2012/03/23 Re: strange problem here with spam detection Richard Doyle
• 2012/03/23 Re: strange problem here with spam detection RW
• 2012/03/23 Re: Quick question about enabling a private rules in the local.cf Simon Loewenthal
• 2012/03/23 Re: Quick question about enabling a private rules in the local.cf Simon Loewenthal
• 2012/03/23 Quick question about enabling a private rules in the local.cf Simon Loewenthal
• 2012/03/23 Re: A flood of new domains ? Benny Pedersen
• 2012/03/23 Re: A flood of new domains ? Robert Schetterer
• 2012/03/23 Re: A flood of new domains ? Per Jessen
• 2012/03/22 Re: SPF_FAIL Noel Butler
• 2012/03/22 Re: SPF_FAIL Benny Pedersen
• 2012/03/22 Re: having trouble running spamassassin from command line to test rules. Eliezer Croitoru
• 2012/03/22 Re: having trouble running spamassassin from command line to test rules. Michael Scheidell
• 2012/03/22 having trouble running spamassassin from command line to test rules. Eliezer Croitoru
• 2012/03/22 Re: SPF_FAIL Dave Warren
• 2012/03/22 Re: was: Allowing IMAP users to train spam/ham is:simplify training of misclassified emails Kevin A. McGrail
• 2012/03/22 Re: SPF_FAIL David F. Skoll
• 2012/03/22 Re: was: Allowing IMAP users to train spam/ham is:simplify training of misclassified emails RW
• 2012/03/22 Re: SPF_FAIL Michael Scheidell
• 2012/03/22 Re: SPF_FAIL David F. Skoll
• 2012/03/22 Re: SPF_FAIL Martin Gregorie
• 2012/03/22 Re: A flood of new domains ? Per Jessen
• 2012/03/22 Re: Conflicting information about bayes database contents in lint debug output RW
• 2012/03/22 Re: was: Allowing IMAP users to train spam/ham is:simplify training of misclassified emails Kevin A. McGrail
• 2012/03/22 Re: SPF_FAIL Kevin A. McGrail
• 2012/03/22 Re: SPF_FAIL xTrade Assessory

• Earlier messages
• Later messages