On Nov 7, 2007 11:19 AM, Scott Swank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can see how <wicket:abstract> and <wicket:implements> tags could be > a nice enhancement to the current <wicket:extend> and <wicket:child> > tags. Do you have a working, or mostly working, patch?
What I think we should do with this is make it an option. It would be turned off by default, requiring users to an extra one or two lines of configuration to turn this on (we've done this before), and let it prove itself. Sounds to me like everyone would be happy. WDYT? Eelco --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
