vihuela  

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar right hand positions

Monica Hall
Sat, 16 Feb 2008 06:09:47 -0800

Thanks for the very useful list of references.   I knew that someone would pick 
up on the fact that all the examples I mentioned were women!   I think your 
explanation is probably right.  They look nice like that.

However the (male) players I have observed who do tend to play with the little 
finger on the soundboard don't keep it glued there all the time - it seems to 
be more of a point of reference to which they return in moments of repose (hope 
that sounds suitably poetic).   It is not something confined to the thumb in 
rather than thumb out position either. But you certainly can't do elaborate 
strumming like that. 

The other thing about illustrations is that they capture a single moment in 
time - and what is picturesque.   What they can tell us is rather limited.

As with everything else I suspect different players did different things for 
different reasons - yesterday, today and for ever.

Monica
  I guess part of any possible differences between lute and guitar rioght hand 
positions must be related to strumming: it is extremely inhibiting if the 
little finger is placed on the belly (especially close to the bridge as the 
lute) - tho not impossible as some of the pictures listed below suggest.

  Further, and speculatively, the pictures you mention are of, presumably, 
amatuer (and women! - sorry) players  who might, indeed, frequently have been 
taught a less florid, more 'ladylike', style requiring limited strumming (tho' 
a couple of nice exceptions in the short list below). We note many other 
pictures showing a much higher hand position with few representations of little 
finger on belly, esp close to the bridge.  Some examples of various types up to 
early 18th C from Grunfeld (The Art and Times of the Guitar, 1969) in page 
order (I make no comment on the text - or sex....):

  LITTLE FINGER ON BELLY CLOSE TO BRIDGE

  Engraving -Dame de qualite jouant de la Guitarre(Trouvain, Paris 1694)

  Ditto (Berey, Paris c 1690)

   Netscher - Lady playing guitar (1680)

  Vermeer - guitar player (c 1670)

  Teniers - guitarist (c 1670)  

  Quesnel - Young woman playing guitar (1681)

  LITTLE FINGER ON BELLY BUT PLAYED HIGH 

  Fresco - Young woman playing a Guitar (Venice c 1650?)

  Du Boullogne - The five senses (c 1630)

  Raoux - The dangerous lesson!?/liaison (c1700)

  NO FINGER ON BELLY PLAYED HIGH

  Engrafing - Dame en habit de chambre (1675)

  Amants Donnant une Seranade (Paris 1693)

  Le Caffe de Rome (Paris  c 1700)

  Title plate of Foscarini's 4th book

  Velasquez - Three musicians (c 1630)

  Rombouts  - Ditto (c 1630)

  Rombouts - Musicians (c1630)

   Ryckaert - A Musical Gathering (c 1660)   NB - WOMAN!

  Ryckaert - Hausmusik (c 1650)

  De Boullogne- guitarist  (c 1630)

  Daret - guitarist (c 1660)

  Coques - the duo (c 1670) NB Man and woman both playing v high no finger on 
belly

  Lely - Ladies of the Lake family (c1660)

  Teniers - guitarist (c1670).

  Schubler - Amours....  (c 1730?)

  Watteau ' scene d'amour (c1710)

  Watteau - Five different drawing studies (c1710)

  Clearly, this list is selective (I don't know Grunfeld's criteria for 
inclusion) but  all this variation suggests (like with lute right hand 
position) much need for proper comprehensive research. Nevertheless from 
memories of other representations, I'd say it is a reasonably fair cross 
section of pictures and suggests that MOSTLY the little finger wasn't rested on 
the belly and that a highish hand position (say towards the rose) was common.

  Finally, and I think of interest in this context, when the modern plucking 
style came in (c 1800) many representations show little finger again on the 
belly plucking between the bridge and rose (indeed, some of the great 19thC 
virtuosi used this - Regondi, Mertz...). I presume this reversion is because 
there was no longer much call for florid strumming.

  Martyn











  Monica Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
    > my own experience. As to the issue of placing the little finger on the top
    > (which is what many thumb-in lutenists do, also on the guitar...): this is
    > not exactly supported by guitar related sources (do you know of any source
    > saying that?), nor by iconography. On the contrary. It most likely was not
    > a
    > standard feature of guitar technique in the 17th century, although some
    > will
    > have played like that. It makes me wonder what you wish to prove by saying
    > this....

    On reflection I feel I can't let this go unchallenged. There is an 
    attractive painting of a girl playing the guitar by the Dutch(!) painter 
    Casper Netscher in which she is clearly shown playing with her little 
finger 
    resting inside the moustache of the bridge. You can see this on the web 
    site of the Wallace Collection in London where the picture is on view. 
    There is also another painting of the actress Mary Davis by Peter Lely in 
    which it looks as if she could be resting her little finger on the 
    soundboard although it's not entirely clear. On p. 99 of Frederick 
    Grunfeld's book there is a painting from a 17th century fresco in Venice in 
    which she also looks as if she might be resting her little finger on the 
    soundboard. Another on p.126 by the French painter Quesnel. And of course 
    there is the Vermeer painting. Not so long ago Stuart put some 
    illustrations on his site from one of Pesori's books which shows a rather 
    odd position which could be thumb inside. I can't go through my entire 
    picture collection but I would say on the basis of the pictorial evidence 
    that there was considerable variety in hand positions. Of course whether 
    the pictures are accurate or not is another matter.

    Do you know of any guitar sources which describe right-hand position at 
all? 
    Perhaps you could lists these for us. On what basis can you claim that this 
    wasn't a standard feature of guitar technique?

    Absence of evidence and considerations of whether or not illustrations are 
    accurate don't seem to have deterred you from claiming that the guitar was 
    often wire strung in early 17th century Italy. There is only the rather 
    crude drawing on the title page of Corbetta's 1639 book. How many guitar 
    books do you know which say that the guitar was wire strung?

    Monica




    > To get on or off this list see list information at
    > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html







------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Sent from Yahoo! - a smarter inbox.
--