Stuart Walsh
Sun, 03 Jan 2010 03:03:24 -0800
But Foscarini's own examples of the passacalles don't fit this at all. They really do seem to just meander about, always hinting at a typical passaccalles but never quite being it. Monica has had a go at an edited reconstruction of one in E minor. *http://tinyurl.com/y8mvxfd (page 17) -Passacaglio Variato sopra l'+*
//There is no (easily discernible) repeated four bar structure and no (easily discernible) direction to the music. And it's in two parts! After 57 bars the first part ends and second part sort of carries on in more or less the same way for another 64 bars. And it's as if Foscarini really liked the sound and feel of certain chord changes - especially E minor at second position to B minor with a g in the melody on top.
I've had a go at the first part. Technically it is not difficult piece but I always manage to make a pig's ear of one bit or another and my guitar runs out of tone in bars 16-19; it's like squeezing an orange with no juice left. But I suspect a good player could make something of the piece and the Part 2 would go yet deeper into the strange little world. Maybe the use of repicco and trillo would spice it up a bit?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XiJS0GVT5A Stuart To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html