Jones and Axil—
A additional idea in connection with the Proton 21 folks and the Stanford
strung theory folks:
It may be that after the super heavies formed during inflation, the unstable
super super heavies evaporated/exploded and only a reduced of stable super
heavies remained, well distributed as dark matter in the expanding universe
consistent with SOBB.
PS: What has happened to these folks in the last ten to 15 years? Did they
suffer the same ridicule of being “scientific frauds” as others, currently and
in the past, have in the field of LENR?
Maybe Jed knows?
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:09 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:LENR Insights from Proton 21
The big bang may still hold, if the super heavies were formed early- on, caused
the expansion early-- on (inflation) with repulsive gravity and then changed
to attractive gravity after the initial rapid inflation.
The big bang (BB) will become the standard of BB models, SOBB. It may
require only the addition of a SINGLE constant!
Sent: Sunday, July 9, 2017 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR Insights from Proton 21
On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Axil Axil
There is another assumption connected with these sections and it refers to
cosmology. It is known that there is a great quantity of "dark" matter in the
universe, and it cannot be detected by ordinary tools. It is possible that the
"black holes" we observed are part of this matter. It may be made of the nuclei
of super heavy elements.
Such a fact would appear to militate against the 'Young Universe' 'Big Bang'
theory, wouldn't it..? It would take a LOT of time to build up such a huge mass
of trans-uranic elements thruout the Kosmos...