Re: [Vo]:Jed's misunderstanding of BLP_ Robin's correction

[Mike Carrell]

Robin, thank you for your correction. 204 eV is still a lot of energym much 
more so than with H(1/2). The important thing is that it gives credence to 
the statements about electrolysis and regeneration of the solid fuel -- with 
surplus power for externalk work.

Mike Carrell


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robin van Spaandonk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Jed's misunderstanding of BLP


In reply to  Mike Carrell's message of Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:05:14 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
In the animation of the process, in the fourth stage KH(1/4) is mentioned 
as
a product. H(1/4) designates hydrinos shrunk by a factor of 4, releasing 
435
eV in the process.

435 eV is the potential energy of H[n=1/4], not the energy released during
formation. The latter is actually 217.7 - 13.6 = 204.1 eV.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

The shrub is a plant.


________________________________________________________________________
This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T. Department.