vortex-l  

Re: [Vo]:V'Ger must evolve

Harry Veeder
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:47:31 -0700

On 17/4/2008 8:35 AM, OrionWorks wrote:

> Got the following article originally from www.codeproject.com. It was
> original titled "V'Ger must evolve!" Amusing.
> 
> See:
> 
> http://space.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn13676&print=true
> or
> http://tinyurl.com/5uwleq
> 
> Pioneer spacecraft mystery may be laid to rest
> 14:30 15 April 2008
> NewScientist.com news service
> Valerie Jamieson, St Louis
> 
> Excerpt:
> 
>> Uneven heat
> 
>> The wealth of data has allowed them to build detailed
>> computer models of Pioneer 11, including a thermal
>> model which shows how heat is distributed over the
>> spacecraft. This has revealed that Pioneer 11 gives
>> off heat in certain directions more than others. The
>> uneven heat emission is enough to nudge the spacecraft
>> off course, accounting for 28% to 36% of the anomaly
>> detected when Pioneer 11 was 3750 million kilometres,
>> or 25 times the Earth-sun distance, away from us.
> 
> [But what about the remaining 64% to 72%? - svj]
> 



More space probe anomalies....
Harry
  

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2008-02-29-nasa-spacecraft-anomal
ies_N.htm

NASA baffled by unexplained force acting on space probes
2008-02-29

By Charles Q. Choi, Special to SPACE.com
Mysteriously, five spacecraft that flew past the Earth have each displayed
unexpected anomalies in their motions.

These newfound enigmas join the so-called "Pioneer anomaly" as hints that
unexplained forces may appear to act on spacecraft.

A decade ago, after rigorous analyses, anomalies were seen with the
identical Pioneer 10 and 11 spacecraft as they hurtled out of the solar
system. Both seemed to experience a tiny but unexplained constant
acceleration toward the sun.

A host of explanations have been bandied about for the Pioneer anomaly. At
times these are rooted in conventional science ‹ perhaps leaks from the
spacecraft have affected their trajectories. At times these are rooted in
more speculative physics ‹ maybe the law of gravity itself needs to be
modified.

Now Jet Propulsion Laboratory astronomer John Anderson and his colleagues ‹
who originally helped uncover the Pioneer anomaly ‹ have discovered that
five spacecraft each raced either a tiny bit faster or slower than expected
when they flew past the Earth en route to other parts of the solar system.

'Humble and perplexed'

The researchers looked at six deep-space probes ‹ Galileo I and II to
Jupiter, the NEAR mission to the asteroid Eros, the Rosetta probe to a
comet, Cassini to Saturn, and the MESSENGER craft to Mercury. Each
spacecraft flew past our planet to either gain or lose orbital energy in
their quests to reach their eventual targets.

In five of the six flybys, the scientists have confirmed anomalies.

"I am feeling both humble and perplexed by this," said Anderson, who is now
working as a retiree. "There is something very strange going on with
spacecraft motions. We have no convincing explanation for either the Pioneer
anomaly or the flyby anomaly."

In the one probe the researchers did not confirm a noticeable anomaly with,
MESSENGER, the spacecraft approached the Earth at about latitude 31 degrees
north and receded from the Earth at about latitude 32 degrees south. "This
near-perfect symmetry about the equator seemed to result in a very small
velocity change, in contrast to the five other flybys," Anderson explained ‹
so small no anomaly could be confirmed.

The five other flybys involved flights whose incoming and outgoing
trajectories were asymmetrical with each other in terms of their orientation
with Earth's equator.

For instance, the NEAR mission approached Earth at about latitude 20 south
and receded from the planet at about latitude 72 south. The spacecraft then
seemed to fly 13 millimeters per second faster than expected. While this is
just one-millionth of that probe's total velocity, the precision of the
velocity measurements was 0.1 millimeters per second, carried out as they
were using radio waves bounced off the craft. This suggests the anomaly seen
is real ‹ and one needing an explanation.

The fact this effect seems most evident with flybys most asymmetrical with
respect to Earth's equator "suggests that the anomaly is related to Earth's
rotation," Anderson said.

As to whether these new anomalies are linked with the Pioneer anomaly, "I
would be very surprised if we have discovered two independent spacecraft
anomalies," Anderson told SPACE.com. "I suspect they are connected, but I
really do not know."

Unbound idea

These anomalies might be effects we see with an object possessing a
spacecraft's mass, between 660 and 2,200 lbs. (300 and 1,000 kg), Anderson
speculated.

"Another thing in common between the Pioneer and these flybys is what you
would call an unbound orbit around a central body," Anderson said. "For
instance, the Pioneers are flying out of the solar system ‹ they're not
bound to their central body, the sun. For the other flybys, the Earth is the
central body. These kinds of orbits just don't occur very often in nature ‹
it could be when you get into an unbound orbit around a central body,
something goes on that's not in our standard models."

The researchers are now collaborating with German colleagues to search for
possible anomalies in the Rosetta probe's second flyby of the Earth on
November 13.

"We should continue to monitor spacecraft during Earth flybys. We should
look carefully at newly recovered Pioneer data for more evidence of the
Pioneer anomaly," Anderson added. "We should think about launching a
dedicated mission on an escape trajectory from the solar system, just to
look for anomalies in its motion."

Montana State University physicist Ronald Hellings, who did not participate
in this study, said, "There's definitely something going on. Whether that's
because of new physics or some problem with the model we have is yet to be
worked out, as far as I know. A lot of people are trying to look into this."

Anderson and his colleagues will detail their latest findings in an upcoming
issue of the journal Physical Review Letters.
Copyright 2007, SPACE.com Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.