Michel Jullian
Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:24:20 -0700
Good point ;-) But their argument that city scale utility plants cost less per watt than rooftop residential installations makes sense, so it might be a win-win case. Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robin van Spaandonk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 5:52 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: "Best of the best" near-term horizon In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Fri, 18 Apr 2008 01:36:24 +0200: Hi, [snip] >Seriously though Jones, have a look at Nanosolar's latest declarations (last >few days) and tell me if they still don't make sense to you: >http://blog.nanosolar.com/ [snip] Quote: "There is a reason why one of the world's largest power producers invested in Nanosolar." ...and that reason is that they want to continue selling power to people forever, rather than have the people harvest it themselves for nothing. ;) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk The shrub is a plant.