vortex-l  

Re: [Vo]:responce to the IPKat - weblog

Terry Blanton
Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:17:55 -0700

Thomis,

It's 'Randell Mills'.  He does not get an 'A'.

Teri

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:38 PM, thomas malloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Carrell wrote:
>
>
> > A standard tactic of patent examiners is deny and cite objections and
> force the applicant to overcome the objections. Objections of this type have
> been seen before. The process of overcoming them is iterative, lengthy,
> expensive, and private. It is reasonable to believe that such interaction is
> ongoing and necessary to protect investors and prospective partners. Legal
> action may follow, which would make interesting theater.
> >
>
>  Dear Kat;
>
>  I post on Vortex-L, scientific anomalies. One of the Vortexians posted the
> URL of your comments on Randall Mills of Black Light Power. In one of the
> papers on the BLP website, Randall claims that he can produce energy from a
> BLP reactor, 1 KW / 2 cubic feet of reactor. He also claims to have produced
> various novel materials. His investors have clearly invested tens of
> millions of dollars in his research, and either he can do what he says he
> can do, or he can't. If he can do, then science is just going to have to
> adjust.
>
>  Your poking fun at Randall is a continuation of the attacks which have been
> made against researchers in a number of areas. What they have in common is
> questioning the established paradigms. In 1909 Scientific American published
> an article questioning the feasibility of heavier than air machine flight.
> Some of the dumbest people I've ever met have graduate degrees. In
> particular law degrees, two of them want to be the next president.
>
>
>  --- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! --
> http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html ---
>
>