Re: [Vo]:Re: responce to the IPKat - weblog

[Terry Blanton]

You have a far greater command of the language.

Terry

On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Michel Jullian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas won't get an A then? ;)
>
>  Michel
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: "Terry Blanton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
>  Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 11:24 PM
>  Subject: Re: [Vo]:responce to the IPKat - weblog
>
>
>  > Tomis,
>  >
>  > It's 'RandEll' not 'RandAll'.
>  >
>  > <sigh>
>  >
>  > T
>  >
>  > On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Terry Blanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >> <slaps head>
>  >>
>  >>  Terry
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>  On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 1:20 AM, thomas malloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >>  > Terry Blanton wrote:
>  >>  >
>  >>  >
>  >>  > > Thomis,
>  >>  > >
>  >>  > > It's 'Randell Mills'.  He does not get an 'A'.
>  >>  > >
>  >>  > >
>  >>  > >
>  >>  >  Randell doesn't get an A, what does that mean? The questions are: 
> does his
>  >>  > reactor produce the amount of energy that he says it does, and can his
>  >>  > processes produce novel, and useful materials. If the answer to either 
> of
>  >>  > these questions is yes, than his critics can go soak their heads. If 
> his
>  >>  > techniques contradict the laws of physics, then it's the laws of 
> physics
>  >>  > that have to change. The people who believe other wise have graduate
>  >>  > degrees.
>  >>  >
>  >>  >
>  >>  >
>  >>  >
>  >>  >  --- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! --
>  >>  > http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html ---
>  >>  >
>  >>  >
>  >>
>  >
>
>