Esa Ruoho
Sun, 11 May 2008 04:03:49 -0700
why call him bendini - what possible use is it to mispell Bedini? why call the company energetics when its called Energenx? http://www.energenx.com ? did you know r-charge+energenx went public lately, even as far as to reuters? < http://www.*reuters*.com/article/pressRelease/idUS193314+08-Apr-2008+PRN20080408 > also, have you seen energy from the vacuum part 2? also, maybe you want to look a bit into jim watson's replication of the bedini device, from the 1980s.. 2008/5/11 thomas malloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Vortexians; > As a part of my investigation of the Valone Matter, I mentioned the subject > of FE machines to my friend Bible Code Roy. He mentioned the Bendini patent, > and pointed out that the Bendini Motor appears to be OU. This led me to > contact the author, Rick Friedrich, of www.r-charge.com . Energetics is a > publicly traded corporation, so they have to distance themselves from > anything flaky (OU machines). However Rick, sent me to > http://www.rpmgt.org/SSG.html on which he has posted the plans which will > enable me to build a working OU motor. > > The Energetics chargers are supposed to reverse Pb sulfate (?) formation, > so I can pick up some batteries at the scrap yard and this machine will > rejuvenate them. One battery bank will run the machine, which recharges the > other battery bank. Periodically the operator can partially discharge one of > the battery banks, yielding some useful energy. > Assuming that the test machine preforms as advertised, I could build a > larger version which would charge a bank of batteries. If they were wired > through a multi pole contactor, the batteries could be switched from > parallel to series, producing 250 volts. This would allow it to power a flow > water heater, or a space heater. The question is, will the cost of the > energy released by the battery be competitive with natural gas, or > electricity? According to Rick, the price of fuel would have to double, and > then some, before such a system would be practical. It has occurred to me > that it would be just the toy for the nerd who has everything, also it > appears to be just a matter of time before the price of fuel doubles, eh? > The price of a machine that I could build out of a scrap pile would be a > fraction of what a commercially produced machine would be. > > It will also be of interest to some of you that my friend Daryl, who is a > EE and is in the solar power business. He confirmed Rick's statement that > battery degeneration is a big problem, for the solar energy business. The > Energetics charger was designed to address this matter. So I assume that he > will investigate that end of the matter. > > I'm wondering about the reversal of the sulfating process by the pulse > displayed on the r-charge website. I'm assuming that this will be of > interest to some of you. Rick also mentioned Li ion batteries. He said that > Energetics will never produce a charger for them. Apparently they tend to > catch fire, or explode. Either event is not conducive to getting a UL seal > of approval. Rick also mentioned military applications, this being grounds > for getting kicked off of his discussion group. I mentioned LENR's as a > possible explanation for anomalous energy release in Li ion batteries. I've > never forgotten the laboratory explosion in Japan involving electrical arks > in water. My primary interest at the moment is to figure out how to avoid > them. > > The bottom line is that we seem to have several anomalies here. The motor's > pulse to the battery is produced by a caducisus coil. It reverses an > irreversible reaction, and a reversible reaction, in addition to producing > anomalous energy. I wonder if the coil gets cold when it runs? > > > --- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! -- > http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html --- > > -- - whatever it is that you take from others is taken from you