[Vo]:Re: HyLENR : was: Britain reveals UFO documents

[Michel Jullian]

Particle physics = QM, so QM reactions means... reactions, right?

What I mean is:

D nuclei in ambient conditions D2 has some non-zero fusion rate.

The nuclei of a D-deuterino molecule must have a much higher fusion rate due to 
the low orbit screening electron. How much higher, Robin, do you know? Wouldn't 
it be so much higher that significant fusion would have been noticed everywhere 
such a molecule is supposed to form?

Michel

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jones Beene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: HyLENR : was: Britain reveals UFO documents


> --- Michel Jullian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> I agree that if hydrinos exist, they are an easy
>> explanation for cold fusion. The problem IMHO is
>> that it is too easy maybe, shouldn't we expect
>> hydrinos or deuterinos to fuse systematically, even
>> in non-CF conditions?
> 
> Not really. IMHO both situation are *QM reactions* and
> require precise, but differing, tunneling or capture
> conditions.
> 
> Even under precise conditions:
> 
> QM = *low probability* ... and the main advantage of
> deuterium is that the charge of the nucleus is "partly
> shielded" by the neutron and therefore may have a
> higher probability of participation in certain
> reactions which differ from those of protium.
> 
> I have been reading Mills' and Stolper's (Mills'
> biographer and a recommended book)... objections to
> this cross-identity with LENR and find the objections
> unconvincing, and more of a public relations gesture
> than anything else (and understandable from that
> perspective) ... but it is clear that Mills'
> supporters think that he can do no wrong, and refuse
> to believe that he could be (at once) "mostly correct
> and significantly incorrect". Same for the other side.
> 
> Jones
> 
>