vortex-l  

Re: [Vo]:News from Japan

Jones Beene
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:04:54 -0700

--- Terry Blanton wrote:
 
> Maybe it's both?  The orbitsphere in a reduced orbit
would restrict the modes of penetrable ZPE photons a
la Casimir. Suppose there is an orbital level whereby
the energy absorbed by the shrunken orbit is slightly
greater that what is required to push the electron out
back to the next fractional energy state with enough
left over to emit a photon.  The orbitsphere might
oscillate between these states radiating every half
cycle... A half-wave ZPE rectifier?  Naa, too bizarre.
 
Funny you should mention that. While re-reading the
paper (fabulous paper BTW) which I recommended to Jeff
Driscoll, it was curious to find that another team at
Lehigh measured the IP (ionization potential) of the
anomalous particle at 55 eV(atomic weight of ~2 but
not consistent with H2 nor He). 

At first, I was thinking that this was probably
because their equipment did not resolve fractional eV
very accurately, since it should have measured 54.4 eV
if we assume that we must keep it to multiples of
13.6. 

But now that you mention this ... hmmm. That should
'round-off' down to 54 instead of 55, arguably. 

Soooo ... let's see.... you get these weird particles
embedded in the tubes that are much smaller than a
molecule, but are not atoms, and the 2 electrons are
very tightly bound. The electrons swap nuclei like
like all electrons are wont to do -- and probably
"think" that they should attract either nucleus at
54.4 eV but instead they oscillate up to 55 eV when at
rest. 

Then if some energy is added, perhaps they begin to
oscillate due to ZPE frequencies providing the
Casimir-like pressure force against them ? 

And since it is not one nucleus but two, that
irregularity in symmetry is what keeps the pump going.

BTW - this spread of .6 eV looks to be a band-gap
equivalent of about 2 microns and therefore this
emergent hypothesis - could be easily falsifiable as
almost any photocell will pick it up ! 

A ZPE pump in disguise ... has a nice ring to it, no?

Guess its a bit premature to contact Hal Puthoff just
yet, but hey -- we may be onto something valid here,
Randy Mills notwithstanding ;-)

Jones