RE: [Vo]:'Super atoms'

[Brian Prothro]

This may not be the exact same thing... There is serious work with electron
Charged Clusters via Ken Shoulders whom started his investigation of them
with physicist Hal Puthoff in Austin Texas.  The implications for energy
generation are so powerful he has been reluctant to go there without a
thorough investigation of containment methodologies.  Ken has come a long
way with his work.  

Best bet is to search Google for Ken Shoulders charged clusters.  Some of
his papers are not online.  If you take an interest I can email any by
request.  Not sure how large they are. 

Brian 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 11:54 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:'Super atoms'

In reply to  Zachary Jones's message of Mon, 7 Jul 2008 19:04:01 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>Thought the list would be interested in this work on easily-
>produceable atom clusters:
>
>http://www.physorg.com/news134129791.html
>
>They claim the principle is old news, but I hadn't heard of the
>electron shell 'conjugation' they suggest in the article.

This may explain something else - the "whitegold" story. Purported among
other
things to be superconducting at room temperature. Some of these "atoms" are
going to get pretty heavy. Also the Russian results from
http://www.proton21.com.ua/index_en.html might actually contain at least
some
"superatom" substances (especially those they claim are far heavier than
Uranium). It would be unreasonable to get such atoms when matter is
bombarded
with high energy electrons, which could easily produce lots of individual
atoms
that then may recondense into clusters mimicking other elements.
Furthermore,
they used metals as targets, and this current work seems to imply that
conductors are a prerequisite.
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk