vortex-l  

Re: [Vo]:UEE and one-watt flames

Jones Beene
Sun, 13 Jul 2008 07:20:48 -0700

-- Michael Foster wrote:

> Horace Heffner: Just about every article about
Kanzius refers to the use of colloidal gold.

> MF:  I haven't followed this story, but I wonder if
they've tried colloidal silver. It's way cheaper and
very easy to make. 

My supply of "Silver Biotics" brand of colloidal
silver was sacrificed to the cause yesterday, and it
did not have any positive effect over and above salt
water. That was using the Stiffler type exciter
circuit at ~one watt. 

It should be noted that this particular silver
supplement is a very weak solution, and a much
stronger concentration should be tried.

Operating under the assumption that a normal candle
flame puts out ~35-40 watts of heat, a rough
guesstimate of the best result so far is amazing. This
was done by a student who is going to record it all
into a YouTube video: and the heat he produced from a
one+ watt DC input (to the exciter board) could be as
much as 20 watts! By comparison, my guesstimate of the
Kanzius video is a 100 watt flame from 200 watts of RF
input.

Don't get excited yet however. This was using
"powdered catalytic converter" innards and the output
is guesswork with no calorimetry- and yes, that
material has entrained carbon, so it is really
meaningless as to a true energy balance thus far....
except that the big attraction is "glowing" results
... as well it should be if carbon is contributing. 

Here is the main point for those trying to understand
the M.O. and the 'big picture', and I will try to
expand this in another post. This is NOT a hydrogen
flame, at least it is not mostly hydrogen (which would
'pop' once and then self-extinguish due to the high
flame speed.

The flame itself is orange-yellow, like that shown in
the Kanzius video - indicating sodium and maybe
chlorine ? (but NO greenish color seen). BTW doing
this demands good ventilation even at low power. 

The fact that the flame could be higher in Na ions but
possibly less high in Cl is curious, since Cl is a gas
and naturally you would expect more of it in such a
situation, due to the volatility. That is, if the
ionic bond of salt is being broken in the liquid, due
to RF resonance. 

What happens to the Cl? Does it immediately form
hydrochloric acid and stay put? If so, that could part
of the unusual dynamics of this experiment, and
another reason why Dr Roy was excited by the results.
He is a renowned scientist and not prone to the kind
of emotional enthusiasm which he has demonstrated.

In the (admittedly unlikely) event that there is
actually a real gainful energy anomaly - it would be
easily feasible to redesign a totally closed-system
where everything including the exhaust gas with its
sodium content, is recycled back into the liquid. This
closed cycle might be the wise thing to do now anyway.


If an inert but active catalyst can be found, this
could be most interesting. With high concentration
gold or silver colloid, however, it could get
expensive.

"We're not in Kansas any more, Toto" 
 
Jones

PS "Kanzius" is apparently pronounced like the state:
"Kansas"