Horace Heffner
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:05:19 -0700
On Jul 16, 2008, at 8:17 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
Claim: Cell size: 62.5" x 32.5" = 2031.3 sq in = 1.31 sq m 2800 W / 1.31 sq m = 2137.4 W/m^2(1) Standard Test Conditions (STC) of 1000 Watts per square meterirradiance, air mass of 1.5, 25oC cell temperature used in lab testing andrating of photovoltaic modules.Performance: Pout/Pin => (2137.4 W/m^2) / (1000 W/m^2) => 214 % eff. Remarkable!! Terry
Yup. I already remarked on it in fact, that FreEnergy can't do the basic math, thus proving your point that it is indeed remarkable, but my English aren't going that can happen so good. 8^)
On Jul 11, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 11, 2008, at 8:38 AM, thomas malloy wrote:I just received a Power Point Presentation from FreEnergy. They claim to have a new solar technology called MEL. It is said to be 70% efficient. Existing solar cells are 17% efficient. They say that their cells will be cheaper too. A 62" X 32" panel is supposed to produce 3 KW.Can't do basic math I would guess. That's over 200% efficient. Only way that's going that can happen is if the cell is illuminated by reflectors, thus increasing the "size".Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/