In reply to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'s message of Wed, 11 May
2005 17:29:20 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>I gather there has been some speculation that much of the missing mass 
>recently detected in our universe might turn out to be nothing more exotic 
>than hydrinos floating about in the deep recesses of outer space. The 

That is Mills' contention.

>implication is that this yet-to-be-detected state of matter does not tend to 
>interact with other hydrinos nor other elements - except in special situations 
>like the BLP catalysts. 

Actually according to Mills, the disproportionation reaction would
allow hydrinos to react with one another. This implies as far as I
can tell that the only reason they are still there, is that they
are too widely dispersed to interact frequently.
Personally, I think the entire model of the universe needs
rebuilding from the ground up. There is almost nothing in modern
cosmology that I would keep. The whole thing is a giant house of
cards, with assumption resting upon assumption....etc.

>All this, of course, remains highly debatable for now.

Yes, but Mills' experimental results are interesting nevertheless.
There does appear to be something going on that is definitely
worthy of serious investigation.

>
>I gather that, so far, nobody has figured out a way to directly detect the 
>existence of hydrinos. They are, after all, extremely tiny critters. Setting 
>aside claims of recorded excess heat, the assumption that hydrinos exist 
>appears to be built entirely on unique spectral analysis signatures and 
>special hydride compounds that Mills claims to have manufactured. 

Why set aside the claims of excess heat? BTW there are also the
plasma experiments, where a plasma is created with extraordinary
ease when a Mills catalyst is present.
[snip]
>Too bad there doesn't appear to be an academic interest (perhaps on the 
>graduate level?) in devising experiments that might help prove or disprove in 
>the direct sense the existence of hydrinos.

Indeed.

>
>This does bring up many questions pertaining to whether it is possible for 
>hydrinos to combine with other elements and produce unique alloys with unusual 
>characteristics (i.e. the theorized BLP battery). Again, I get the impression 
>that hydrinos don't interact, perhaps because they are situated down in a deep 
>energy well making it difficult to combine covalently or ionicaly with other 
>elements. 

Hydrinohydride (the negative ion of the hydrino) should form
plenty of ionic compounds.

>Obviously, Mill's special hydride compounds are claims to the effect that 
>there may be circumstances where combinations ARE possible.

See above.

>
>From my perspective there remain many unanswered questions making it difficult 
>to prove that they really exist.

As long as considerable independent confirmation is not attempted,
it will remain questionable, unless an actual commercial product
emerges in the mean time.


Regards,


Robin van Spaandonk

All SPAM goes in the trash unread.

Reply via email to