http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf
THis article shows how a strong magnetic field destroys color in matter to produce mesons. On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote: > The same EM circular polarization Jones has described can also interact > with orbital spin states of electrons in metal lattices and/or mere atoms. > At resonant frequencies, disintegration of the lattice can occur and the > excess angular momentum must be distributed in small quanta of H/2pi. The > same thing may happen when the nuclear spin states are excited with > distribution of angular momentum to the lattice electrons. Resonance may > be the ticket to get the desired coupling. > > In addition the alignment of reactants in a magnetic field may act to > change spin energy states to further facilitate coupling between the > nucleus and the electronic structure. > > The neutrino would be a natural occurrence, given its spin quanta and > variable energy configurations assuming it has mass. LENR reactor designs > may be nothing more than providing an engineered system to allow the > sharing of small spin quanta without the production of neutrinos (or in > concert with their production) and production of phonons—enhanced orbital > spin energy states. > > Jones, I remember the idea of spin disintegration from 50 years back and > was under the impression it was a real reaction. I assumed the technology > became classified, since it disappeared from sight. > > The same thing happened when heavy water was brought to attention of the > physics community in the mid 60’s. That technology also disappeared from > sight. In hind sight it may have dealt with DDL hydrogen and reflects the > Mill’s reactor’s technology. > > And I happen to believe that laser-induced fusion developed by a company > out of Michigan in the mid to late 60’s had its technology classified. > Classification is an inventor’s worst nightmare. > > Bob Cook > > > *From:* Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> > *Sent:* Monday, November 30, 2015 11:59 AM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* [Vo]:Spin amplification and nucleon disintegration > > > Fifty years ago, there was a fair amount of scientific effort put into > the study of “direct nucleon disintegration”. This process can be far > more energetic in output than nuclear fusion, but ironically most of the > energy is lost… in the sense of decay to neutrinos, which are weakly > interacting. Perhaps that is why photonuclear disintegration was nearly > abandoned. Fortunately, it is being revived now, in the context of LENR. > > One (expensive) way to accomplish the disintegration of hydrogen is via > high velocity colliding ions, using a beam line; but a simpler and more > interesting way is via what can be simplified as “spin disintegration.” There > are several kinds of spin, and one of them is transferable (via laser) from > photons to nucleons, even though there is a great disparity in wavelength > vs the target diameter. The transferred energy derives from photon > amplification and absorption and it can reach a critical threshold at a > surprisingly low level. The devastation that follows from excess spin is > similar to the centrifugal destruction of any high RPM object. Yet, here > we see it at the tiniest scale. There is a merger of quantum and > classical spin mediated by SPP, which requires more study. > > For the purposes of LENR, it will be proposed that an overlooked way that > photons interact with nucleons is via depositing focused spin energy, > leading to self-destruction. The spin angular momentum of light, or SAM - is > associated with circular polarization. Circular polarization happens when > electric and magnetic fields rotate around an axis during the propagation, > such as in the SPP plasmon. Focusing occurs in what appears to be a > vortex geometry. > > SAM is manifested as SPP which once absorbed beyond a critical level results > in the internal disruption of QCD color exchange, allowing stable Efimov > states in quarks to disassemble. In short, and in defense of Holmlid’s > work – one part of the nuclear establishment has known for fifty years that > there is an alternate route to vast amounts of energy without fusion of > nucleons, > by facilitating nucleons degeneration via spin interference with QCD. > > Laser emissions are not inherently circularly polarized. Holmlid may have > overlooked the importance of polarization (or maybe this is a trade > secret of his). Since he has been successful, apparently without using > polarization, then there appears to be an easy route to improvement or > else it is inherent to SPP. Below are a few examples of the old ideas on > using photon spin for nucleon disintegration. Dozens of further citations > have not yet made their way into the digital world. > > Was this kind of thinking “dated” or was it ahead-of- its-time? > > *http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0029558261903534* > <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0029558261903534> > > *http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0370269377900090* > <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0370269377900090> > > *https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:7250209* > <https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:7250209> > > As you may surmise, all of this comes back to an emerging premise for > understanding LENR based on Holmlid’s work. That premise is that at the > very heart of the reaction we find nucleon disintegration, first and > foremost - which is identified by a growing population of muons, which deposit > some excess energy but are also able to catalyze fusion, in the known way. > > *https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg104933.html* > <https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg104933.html> > > With the bottom line being that we can plug Holmlid’s results directly, or as > interpreted by others, as a fundamental insight into the dynamics of LENR > going back to 1989… and it all makes more sense than before. This is > especially true when the Letts/Cravens effect is added into the mix. And > one irony is that neither Holmlid nor Letts/Cravens seems to have been > aware of the importance of SPP, which is shaping up as the key dynamic. > > Jones > >
