In his latest travesty of a blog, Peter Gluck wrote:

"However I think his anger has a deeper cause- he is wanting or being
> pushed somehow to defend IH's very unnatural, surprising and implausible
> position so he has to tell difficultly believable things- he also does not
> know much about IH's real position , arguments and justifications. Do you
> agree, Jed?"


No, this is completely wrong in every respect, as I have pointed out many
times previously:

No one is pushing me.

There is nothing unnatural, implausible or unbelievable about I.H.'s claim.
Any person who understands calorimetry and examines the data will agree
with their analysis. If Rossi and Penon seriously believe there is 50 times
output they are both certified idiots (not just Penon).

As I said, several times, I have seen some of the technical data from the
calorimetry. Based on that, I am sure I.H. is correct, and Rossi is wrong.
I have also seen independent verification of this data from sources outside
of I.H., so I am sure it is real.

I know enough about I.H.'s "real position" regarding calorimetry to judge
this matter, although I look forward to learning more. I know nothing about
business arrangements or contracts.

I have enough information to judge these things with confidence. You, on
the other hand, know nothing about them. All you have to go on are Rossi's
assertions from his blog. These range from nonsense to impossible. The
information he already released in the lawsuit rules out his claims. If the
reactor were producing as much heat as he claims, he and the others in the
building would be cooked. They would be dead. In fact, it is not producing
any excess heat. If and when I.H. becomes free to publish the technical
data, everyone will see this, and you will see that Rossi has been playing
you for a fool.

- Jed

Reply via email to