The ERV made two rulings first to award 1.5 million to Rossi and then another $10,000,000 based on his judgement that the Rossi reactor worked. This sets a precedent that IH accepted the judgment of the ERV as competent, impartial, valid and binding.
But now when it comes down the billion dollar judgment, the ERV is a fraud. I don't think that line of reasoning will hold up in court. Such and argument seems inconsistent, against precedence, arbitrary and self serving. Is the ERV competent when he serves the interests of IH? Is that justice and fair play; the court will decide. On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The Judge is going to ask IH if they gave the ERV absolute authority as >> the agent of arbitration to determine if the terms of the licence agreement >> were met. Then the Judge will ask the ERV if he has determined if the terms >> of the Licence agreement were met. . . . >> > > Are you the judge? A friend of the judge, perhaps? > > Are you a lawyer? Because if you are, I am surprised you passed the bar. > Every lawyer I have asked thinks that what you are saying is nonsense, and > they think you have no idea what you are talking about. > > If the ERV say in court that he thinks the terms were met, he should pack > his bags and take the first airplane for Italy as soon as he leaves the > stand, to avoid being arrested for perjury and fraud. > > - Jed > >
