No Jed I do not know the results. I know not to spout firm controversial
judgment. the  without support.
I am sure you know. I am less sure of you judgment, based on your vague bak
up of your statements
On May 20, 2016 17:29, "Jed Rothwell" <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com> wrote:
>
>> Jed, if I had nothing I should say nothing.
>> Vague data and very mean conclusion.
>>
> There is nothing vague about it! Rossi's own numbers show the temperature
> of the fluid is just above 100°C. That is his own data, in the Lewan
> interview. What more can you ask for? He did not quote the pressure,
> because that would show it is hot water. That plus other data shows it is
> below 100°C. There is no steam!
>
>
>> There is no win in that behavior regardless of if you are right or wrong.
>> Just reflects back on you.
>>
> I am telling you clear-cut facts, confirmed by Rossi himself.
>
> Furthermore, you are evading, dancing around the issues, and refusing to
> face reality when you will not admit that Rossi's blocking the door to the
> customer factory proves beyond any question that he is a fraud. If there
> was a machine in there consuming 1 MW of process heat he would be thrilled
> to show it. It would be the first thing he shows everyone. There can be
> NOTHING in there.
>
> Your blather and evasions are tiresome. Rossi torpedoed himself in that
> interview. He inadvertently proved once and for all that there is no heat,
> and that the test was fake.
>
> If you disagree, tell us why he would refuse to show definitive proof of
> his own claim. Go ahead, give a reason. Amuse us. Rossi himself has not
> even tried to invent a reason. He just says "it isn't important." Do you
> buy that? Do you think it is not important? Why do you let Rossi feed you
> such arrogant, foolish nonsense?
>
> - Jed
>
>

Reply via email to