a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:
> AA. Jed, you have made much of Rossi's refusal to allow IH to visit the > customer's plant. Now that statement looks very misleading unless you have > some evidence that Rossi lied about it being IH's written agreement. > I have no knowledge of this alleged agreement, but I know that Rossi constantly lies about all kinds of things, including me. However, as I pointed out above, even if there were such an agreement, any sensible person would agree to modify it when the I.H. expert insisted he needed access. I gave the reasons above. I suggest you address these reasons, rather than pretending that an agreement of this nature is a suicide pact that both parties must blindly adhere to. Let me partially repeat the reasons for your convenience. I suggest you address them, honestly, instead of dancing around the issue and making absurd excuses for Rossi. 1. Rossi himself in the interview said that the I.H. expert insisted upon seeing the customer side. Surely you realize that this is a reasonable request, and that any expert would insist on it. Agreement or no agreement, Rossi should have acquiesced. It would have instantly proven his case. It would instantly resolve all doubts. There is no rational reason to deny this request. 2. Whatever they agreed to, it is common sense to alter an agreement in response to a reasonable request. I cannot imagine a more reasonable request than this, or one that would better serve Rossi's own purposes -- assuming he is honest and he actually has 1 MW. Opening the customer site would have as many advantages to Rossi as to I.H. . . . 3. Rossi is not a reliable source of information. . . . 4. Apply some common sense. Ask yourself: what other reason would Rossi have to refuse admittance, other than the fact that there is no 1 MW machine, and no ventilation system or other means of getting rid of the waste heat? Can you propose ANY reason why an honest person would hesitate to open the door? - Jed
