a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:
> Your claim that the heat released from the 1 MW plant would be fatal has > been shot down. > That was not my claim. You are making a straw-man argument. My claim was that without industrial grade ventilation, when you heat a space with 26 times more heat than is normally used in winter, and you leave the heaters on continuously without a thermostat, that space will soon be so hot it kills people. However, if there is proper ventilation, that will not happen. Therefore, in order to prove there was 1 MW of heat production, Rossi had to show the I.H. expert the ventilation equipment: the fans and ducts. The expert had to perform a conventional measurement of air temperature and flow to demonstrate that 1 MW of heat was continuously removed from the room. THAT is my claim. Do you agree or not? If not, why not? This is especially important because Rossi's own calorimetry shows no excess heat. The only way he could convince anyone is to show the customer equipment and ventilation. > Likewise, your certainty of fraud because Rossi was the one who prevented > IH from visiting the customer. > Rossi was the one. He said so himself. I regard that as proof of fraud. If you do not, we have a large difference of opinion. I have several other reasons for thinking this is fraud, which I have not revealed. > Your other evidence of fraud seem to come mainly from what IH has told you. No, it is from what Rossi himself has said, and from his calorimetric data, which shows no excess heat. I.H. played no role in my evaluation. > Before accepting that IH is a knight in shining armor who speaks only > truth you should read this. I.H. has nothing to do with it. Rossi himself provided all the proof I need that he is a fraud, mainly in his interview with Lewan. - Jed
