This demonstation of 'correlated magnetic phenomenon' is not working as explained. Obviously if magnets allowed to move freely they arrange their positions for attraction only and they will stick. Otherwise they had found a way to circumvent the Earnshaw theorem.
On 5/28/16, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: H Ucar > >> I experimentally show oscillatory magnetic interaction between dipole >> bodies exhibits strong repulsion at short distance therefore provides >> eqilibrium for the bound state in presence of attractive magnetic or >> electric forces... This mechanism could be the origin of weak and strong >> interactions without requiring new forces or glue particles.... Since the >> bound states through magnetic interactions are fully dynamic, it might be >> possible to disturb or break it easier than if based on static forces.... > > > This is insightful - and I agree with the general conclusion despite the > vast difference in scale, when moving from centimeters to angstroms. The > same point is also made by the "correlated magnetic" phenomenon, in which > "repel" and "attract" functions are coded into a single magnet, which does > both depending on relative position. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POc32aioLFE > > The strong and weak force could be a similar situation - with the so-called > 5th force being a relic of one or the other. > > > >
