It seems this is a second effort by IH/Cherokee to dismiss Rossi's charges. Sifferkoll comments as follows.
Rossi_et_al_v_Darden_et_al__flsdce-16-21199__0019.0 <http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Rossi_et_al_v_Darden_et_al__flsdce-16-21199__0019.0.pdf>
It seems that in the US lawyer bot docs has been made into an art form … but with some interesting nuggets though.
Fast executive summary; * not enough signatures, so a working MW reactor doesn’t matter. It came too late. * also they argue that they knew from already when the 2nd amendment was (not) signed that the MW test did not matter … [is that malicious or what?] * IH can distribute IP as they wish … [because of malicious wording in the license] * IH can file patents as they wish … [because of malicious wording in the license] * IH can raise money as they wish since raising money on claims of owning IP (ie. lying) is not the same as selling products … [something for Woodford to think about] * and a lot of text aimed at keeping Darden, Vaughn and Cherokee out of the lawsuit (this seems REALLY important)
