Jack Cole <jcol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was interested to see that SKINR was unable to replicate Celani using > sensitive calorimetry. Quite a thorough paper. Sad to see. > > They wrote: "No excess heat was observed in a calorimeter of a sensitivity > <10 mW when running either the initial or later test protocols during ∼ 200 > days of testing." > Yeah. What a shame. I think between this paper and the work at MFMP Celani's claim is pretty much proved wrong. You never know, but I do not have much hope for it. I doubt that others will go to the trouble of trying to replicate. - Jed
