On 08/26/2016 02:04 PM, David Roberson wrote:
I have been pursuing my model as to how Rossi might be able to show
gauge readings that imply that 1 MW of steam is being delivered while
not being an accurate assessment of the real power.
I assumed that the information published by Engineer48 in
E-CATWORLD.com is accurate.
Why?
The readings which were recorded are /extremely/ implausible, to the
point of being impossible. So why would you assume they're correct?
It's a very reasonable guess is that the readings, as recorded, were
entirely bogus -- the actual values were not what was written down. And
once you've admitted that detail, the rest of it falls immediately -- a
tiny inaccuracy in recording the pressure, plus another inaccuracy in
recording the flow rate, and you're done.
Who are the hoard of witnesses that attested that the data as recorded
was exactly as the gauges read?
At this point all I can say is that we need more data before we can
prove that Rossi is not being truthfully.
Bosh. Go back to the discussion of /where the 1 megawatt of heat was
dumped//./ There was no megawatt of heat dumped on the "customer
site". Rossi claimed there was. What more proof do you need? The rest
is just details. The details may be interesting, but they /follow/ the
proof in this case, they don't provide the proof.