But countless times you have said Rossi is a fraud and the COP<1
Now you're saying the E-Cat maybe worked?
If the E-Cat worked earlier do you really suppose Rossi retrograded performance with time?
AA


On 8/29/2016 5:09 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:

    It seems the American Physical Society is going to publish
    replication results of Rossi's Ni/H2/L reactor
    How are you going to explain that Jed?


Any member can publish anything at an APS conference. (They set that rule many years ago, after a rather gruesome incident.)

This result, if true, might indicate Ni-H cold fusion works, but that has no bearing on the fact that Rossi's 1 year test could not possibly have produced 1 MW.

Rossi's earlier results might be real. I cannot rule that out, as I have said before. However, there is not the slightest chance this result is real because as I said the heat would kill everyone in the room. Also, the flow meter and pressure readings appear to be fake. The flow meter numbers are too regular to be true, and the pressure is impossible.

- Jed


Reply via email to