Jones, Could we possibly identify the aether in terms of relativistic frames? I don't think anyone would argue with exchanges between time and space creating unbalanced reactionary motion from the perspective of the stationary observer viewing a .9 C spacecraft on his radar screen.. obviously the spatial displacement is going to be wrong because the ship is traveling the hypotenuse between the spatial direction of travel and time- instead of .9C the radar will only display the displacement of the spatial component unaware of the temporal portion. Changes in direction made now while the spacecraft is a different frame will appear unbalanced from the stationary perspective because of this temporal component. IMHO Casimir effect is relativistic in the opposite manner wrt near C travel. Casimir effect forces longer wavelength /larger VP to rotate 90 degrees from the spatial axis out onto the temporal such that the Lorentzian shrunken remainder can now fit between the boundaries, time is accelerated inside this frame relative to the stationary observer while time for the observer on the near C spacecraft is slowed wrt the stationary observer. I guess these near C effects would be rarely viewed since any significant change in direction at luminal speeds would tear apart almost any macro object but I think they can occur easily in the opposite direction where we the stationary observers become the equivalent of near C spacecraft relative to the frames and nano observers inside a Casimir cavity - instead of dx the suppression of larger VP in cavities creates dt. In the case of LENR I think this is the bootstrap mechanism where the nature of molecular gas motion based on HUP provides motion between different frames and discounts the disassociation threshold beyond unity while also dilating time such that an accelerated reversible reaction between fractional hydrogen molecules disassociating as they migrate further from the relativistic frame at which they formed and then immediately change to the new frame as atoms and immediately reform as molecules at the new frame level. Of course that was my pet theory for anomalous heat but my point here wrt reactionless drives is that this segregation of frames whether in Casimir cavities or possible setup by standing waves in a microwave cavity [don't forget we also knew ablout anomalous spontaneous emissions in microwave cavities] also has unbalanced reactions at its core because of the temporal component- whether it is photons, electrons or gas molecules doing the reacting doesn't matter it is IMO the segregation of the vacuum density at the heart of all these anomalies. Fran
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 9:43 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Dirac's sea, the EM Drive and Weyl fermions There is a complex web of cross-connections between HTSC (high temperature superconductivity), Weyl fermions, an active aether, copper-oxides, and the RF resonant cavity thruster of Shawyer et al (the EM drive). The cross-connections are ill-defined at present and could be coincidental, but we can take notice of the various links and use that information to steer research. This is especially interesting if we can define an "aether" in such a way that it cannot be discredited. One way is via the theory of Don Hotson. The epo or BEC is based on Dirac's equation and theories - as is all of Hotson's "interpretation of Dirac" and this aether-like field consists entirely of massless electrons, possibly now defined as Weyl fermions, in the context of massless positronium. It makes sense to suggest that the Weyl fermion, which has been recently confirmed as real, is indeed an outlier of the same aether-species of Hotson. Since the BEC (as aether) is fully contained throughout another more basic spatial dimension or foundation (which can be "reciprocal space" or 1D) it would not be unexpected to find some of these massless electrons escaping into our 3-Space, and apparently they are coaxed out of the aether dimension via various "semimetals" which are also superconductive oxides. Wheeler's "quantum foam" may be additional evidence of bleed-over from an epo field into 3-space. The Meissner effect is usually explained as the expulsion of magnetic flux by a superconductor in a magnetic field, but that may be a partial understanding. The phenomenon would be explained differently if we focus on an aether composed of Weyl fermions as Dirac's sea. This would indicate that Meissner repulsion can become (at least partly) a Coulomb's Law effect - instead of only inductive. Probably it is a bit of both and possibly this combined effect relates to the tiny thrust of the EM drive, where the cavity asymmetry creates a "wake" of virtual Weyl fermions. A final piece of the puzzle seems to be that only copper works for the frustum of the EM drive, which would naturally have a copper oxide coating. Silver and stainless steel have been tried and don't work. Copper oxides can become superconductive at high temperature, most often when compounded with other elements. However, there is evidence of that a thin copper oxide coating would have some properties of HTSC on a transitory basis. An interesting detail is the implication that CuO could be a Weyl semimetal and transient HTSC. CuO possibly only works in a very thin layer which explains why some cavities work better than others. It would be most intriguing if transient HTSC can be further linked to the Weyl fermion and to copper oxide and to reactionless thrust. Don Hotson may have posthumously shown us the way.
