Also, Mills have released a new edition of his theory, you can check it out from the what's new page on BrLP's home page, this time in pdf format as well
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 6:44 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > Jones. > As someone who still thinks there is a future for Ni/LAH/Li and that it > has in fact been replicated, I am not so keen on Mills' solution. It looks > to me that there are serious engineering problems with the combination of > very high temperature, electrode wear and moving parts. Even if it can be > made to work well enough for commercial use it is far from an ideal > solution. > What "academia" thinks does not impress me. They failed to duplicate Pons > & Fleischmann because they didn't know what they were doing, that DOE & Co > are going to spend another $25 billion on ITER, that will not be an > economical solution even if it works and apparently have a consensus that > the IPCC models for global warming are right, shows they are incapable of > looking at a problem logically without bias. > AA > > > On 9/3/2016 10:55 AM, Jones Beene wrote: > > *https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01LDVWJ0I/* > <https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01LDVWJ0I/> > > > *https://www.chapters.indigo.ca/en-ca/books/randell-mills-and-the-search/9990052142999-item.html* > <https://www.chapters.indigo.ca/en-ca/books/randell-mills-and-the-search/9990052142999-item.html> > > *http://www.brettholverstott.com/author/* > <http://www.brettholverstott.com/author/> > > I bought the Kindle version but have not finished it yet, and am pleasantly > surprised (but at the same time mildly disappointed). Initial impression: > the author Brett Holverstott is an architect and a decent writer with a > good grasp of the science. The main downside is that he appears to be a > strong proponent of Mills, who cannot bring himself to ask the hard quest > ions or interview the critics (or consider the possibility of scam). But the > preliminary verdict is that this is an enjoyable read, almost a “must > read” for vorticians, despite the lack of balance. This dovetails nicely > into Rossigate, in more ways than one. > > Therefore, I would especially recommend this to all the die-hard Rossi > apostles who will be looking for a new messiah soon. Although Mills could > turn out to be only a more sophisticated version of Andrea Rossi – he has > had more practice at it, enjoys a much higher skill set and has found > competent associates - so there is a decent chance that Mills could > finally pull this off (“this” being the holy grail of alternative energy). > > A more alarming rumor, possibly coincidental - is that Mills is preparing > some kind of gigantic investment offer (billion buckaroos) but without > having scientifically valid proof that his new device even works, or is > ready for prime time. > > Given that most physicists in academia absolutely reject the notion that > Mills has demonstrated any kind of valid anomaly so far, it would be > almost immoral (given the history of failures) - not to allow independent > testing ahead of a massive new round of investment. Mills’ track record > over the years is shoddy at best, and this ebook is negligent in not > covering the failures and false promises in greater detail. Like all > those gigawatts from licensees in New Mexico etc, etc. > > The author states he received no compensation from Mills, but still this lack > of balance in the coverage raises a few eyebrows. > > >
