Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: It is perfectly possible she is even more upset wit Rossi then you, but > perhaps she could tell it. >
She told me! Vociferously. Ask her yourself. > Was she on the list of people to which Industrial Heat has complained > early? > Ask her yourself. > Real Riossi siupporters are focused on EC ats, excess heat, QuarkX, > explanation, lack of radiation. > I will address all of these issues for you: There is no excess heat. The e-cats are all fake. QuarkX is nothing more than a blurry photo of a blue LED. The explanation is simple: it is all fake. If it were real everyone in the warehouse would be dead from the heat. There is no radiation because there is no reaction. > Are you happy with the proofs IH offers for no excess heat? > Yes. The observers are alive and they would be dead if there were 1 MW of heat. If there were 100 kW of heat they would all be very hot, and everyone reported the room was cool. You cannot ask for better proof than that. > Why is IH not publishing the ERV Report, if that could solve anything? > You will have to ask them that. > Why are IH's e-supporters such clumsy bulllies? > Who are we are bullying? You? Rossi? That is your imagination. - Jed
