dear Jones, some 10% of the sum in dispute usually goes to the attorney, lawyers, hudges...everywhere. Te problem depends on the reality of the technology of Rossi and on the billionaire or not statuses of Darden and Vaughn. peter
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > To be brutally honest – why should any of us waste time over the minutiae > of this case? It’s all about “billable hours” … and if anything changes > before the trial, usually it’s less likely to favor the plaintiff. > > > > The going rate for top corporate law firms is over $1000 per hour. (Forbes > says its over $1500 !). The only winners, as in most lawsuits, will be the > attorneys. Think of each of these filings as a new Mercedes. > > > > Rossi and IH are both bleeding and in death throes … neither will survive, > but sadly, the biggest loser of all is the LENR community. What we need to > get out of this funk is any kind of valid scientific breakthrough, even a > modest one, so we can forget Rossigate and move on. > > > > *From:* Jed Rothwell > > > > Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > you can now prove that you have good sources of information; > > can you please explain Item 49 from the Miami Court pacermaker > > explaining us what has Cherokee et al withdrawn and especially WHY? > > > > I know nothing about laws or lawsuits, and I have not read this document. > You should ask a lawyer. Perhaps Jones Beene can enlighten us. > > > > > > Is this an "elastic" withdrawal? > > > > If it is "without prejudice" that means it can be re-introduced. See: > > > > http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/without+prejudice > > > > - Jed > > > > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
