Axil wrote: "Both both Rossi and eros has suffered serious health
issues when in close contact with their reactors."
References please
AA
On 9/20/2016 5:55 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
Rossi now joins the chorus of LENR developers who recognise the
dangers inherent in high power output LENR reactors. Rossi joins ME356
and eros in advising caution based on their observation of
LENR performance characteristics. Both both Rossi and eros has
suffered serious health issues when in close contact with their reactors.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 5:08 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Axil, I doubt the QuarkX is that dangerous. It is not like it
could cause a nuclear explosion.
Rossi seems to think The QuarkX is the future and the real problem
is him being tied up in a legal battle.
In answer to a comment on anther thread, suggesting that because
IH claimed they had tried and failed, consider that MIT and
Caltech concluded that Fleischmann & Pons could not be replicated
0 and we now know it can be.
I don't see IH giving up without getting their hands on the Quark
technology.
AA
On 9/20/2016 4:40 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
Norman
September 20, 2016 at 7:28 AM
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Update of the work on the QuarkX?
Cheers,
Norman
Andrea Rossi
September 20, 2016 at 8:29 AM
Norman:
Still in very good standing, but also still dangerous. Working
mainly on safety issues now.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
If seems that LENR reactors are not as inherently safe as we
all once thought. But the safe deployment of LENR technology
could still be accommodated into the current power infrastructure.
The development of ocean deployment of huge wind turbines will
serve LENR reactor deployment well. A safe method of LENR
deployment will entail the use of those floating platforms
located just off shore.
The technical feasibility of deepwater floating LENR platforms
will not be questioned, as the long-term survivability of
floating structures has been successfully demonstrated by the
marine and offshore oil industries over many decades. However,
the economics that allowed the deployment of thousands of
offshore oil rigs have yet to be demonstrated for floating
LENR reactor platforms. For deepwater wind turbines, a
floating structure will replace pile-driven monopoles or
conventional concrete bases that are commonly used as
foundations for shallow water and land-based reactors. The
floating structure must provide enough buoyancy to support the
weight of the reactor as a function of its size and power
production rating and to restrain pitch, roll and heave
motions within acceptable limits.
Since muon shielding is so problematic, distance from any
population is the one dependable risk mitigation method.
The distance of LENR deployment offshore would be a function
of the range of muon travel before decay and the inverse
square law dilution of muon density together with safe muon
exposure limits.
The floating LENR reactor will be bigger than a sea buoy, but
smaller than a floating wind turbine. Robotize remote
controlled maintence could allow for human free maintenance of
the LENR reactor such as refueling. The activated waste fuel
could be dumped into the deep water or dissolved in acid.
