New Scientists just gets lots wrong and keeps repeating its mistakes ad infinitum example:
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2106321-reality-guide-the-essential-laws-of-cosmology/ New Scientist: "Back in the 1860s, James Clerk Maxwell was melding electricity and magnetism into one unified theory of electromagnetism. But however he sliced the equations, they only made sense if light travelled through space at the same constant speed, regardless of the speed of its source. This is odd. If someone fires a bullet from a moving car, to a bystander the bullet travels at the sum of its speed and the car’s speed. Yet when 20 years later US physicists Albert Michelson and Edward Morley were looking for the luminiferous ether, a medium supposed to carry light, they reached the same conclusion: however you look at it, the speed of light is a constant." http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1743/2/Norton.pdf John Norton: "The Michelson-Morley experiment is fully compatible with an emission theory of light that CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT POSTULATE." On Thursday, 22 September 2016, 23:08, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: #yiv5817438683 #yiv5817438683 -- _filtered #yiv5817438683 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv5817438683 {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}#yiv5817438683 #yiv5817438683 p.yiv5817438683MsoNormal, #yiv5817438683 li.yiv5817438683MsoNormal, #yiv5817438683 div.yiv5817438683MsoNormal {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv5817438683 a:link, #yiv5817438683 span.yiv5817438683MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv5817438683 a:visited, #yiv5817438683 span.yiv5817438683MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv5817438683 span.yiv5817438683EmailStyle17 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv5817438683 .yiv5817438683MsoChpDefault {} _filtered #yiv5817438683 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv5817438683 div.yiv5817438683WordSection1 {}#yiv5817438683 Two slime jobs in New Scientist in response to this https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23130910-300-cold-fusion-sciences-most-controversial-technology-is-back/ From: Alain Sepeda An article on LENR, relative to U.S. House of Representatives committee on armed services with reference to rossi, Larsen, open skepticism, open curiosity...http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/congress-cold-fusion-briefing-1.3772873 I launched a post for debate on lenr-forumhttps://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3827-CBCNews-Canada/ I seen an occasion to spread informations
