Unsolicited observations of identical experimental consequences lends credence to the production of a common causative reaction. For example, Defkalion saw not advantage in reporting a major problem that they suffered in the testing and demonstration of their system that later ture up in other systems. ME356 explained why his testing instruments and sensors were malfunctioning 3 meters away from his reaction. This is very similar to what Defkalion had reported.
Now Holmlid tells why such observations are a result of muon production. Now, the picture becomes a little clearer, a common thread can be drawn to the point that if ionization production is not observed in a LENR experimental situation, then the power production of the reaction and even its existence is rightly questioned. On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> wrote: > Toomuch credit is being given to Me356 andDefkalion. For that matter, Mills > also has a troublesome history. His latest announcement seems curiously like > a 'Me too' response to . > > the E > > The discussion seems to accept the fraudulent claims and empowers them. If > this was a legalaction we would refer to the 'alledged energy production'. > > ________________________________ > From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> > Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2016 1:15 PM > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: RE: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil .... If LENR is heavily deployed in a high density urban > housing situation, then a dense field of general muon interference will > produce a impossible to shield zone of electronic and electrical failure. > -------- > > There is a well-known way to mollify this problem affordably, and provide > extra energy at the same time. Lead itself is way too expensive. > > The idea is to capture muons in a thick jacket around the reactor. Very > thick. The only way to do this cheaply is specialty concrete. > > 10 feet thickness of specialty concrete which is made with the addition of > iron ore and lead ore to Portland cement will convert 90% of muons into low > grade heat. Copper tubing can remove the heat. Not fancy, but ideal for > places like northern China and Russia which can use lots of low grade heat. > A dollar of lead ore is superior to $100 of lead metal. > > >
