Easily testable, just have someone attending a Mills demo carry an integrating 
neutron detector such as a bubble detector. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] 
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 8:46 AM
To: Vortex List
Subject: [Vo]:The other "heavy water"

With speculation rampant on the subject of the latest Mills/BrLP miracle device 
- here are a few thoughts from the fringe that most observers have never 
contemplated.

As we know from 75 years of experimentation with heavy water - neutrons are 
hard to avoid and passing an electron beam through deuterium will release 
neutrons in proportion to the power of the discharge. One cannot avoid this 
problem using distilled water, due to small amount of deuterium and the 
statistical energy distribution in electric arcs (Boltzmann's tail). However, 
deuterium-depleted water is available. For a price. It is a bit ironic that to 
avoid the "taint" of nuclear energy, a demo could be required to employ an 
expensive fuel which is depleted of D. Ironic in a way.

The normal water supply water contains about 1 molecule in 3,200 of HDO (one 
hydrogen atom in every 6,400 is in the form of D) but full heavy water 
molecules are much rarer yet are not required for neutron spallation via 
electric discharge. Passing an electric arc through water or steam containing 
HDO will eventually debilitate (activate) any reactor... after a predictable 
time frame. This is due to neutron activation of the most metal components. It 
may require a long time frame but it cannot be ignored. The problem is less 
with lower voltage, but it is always there... at least without using deuterium 
depleted water. This fact severely limits the demonstration time parameter - 
due to liability issues with neutron irradiation... unless depleted water is 
used ... and it is costly.

Thus we can be fairly certain that the SunCell (TM) in these demos uses water 
which has been depleted of HDO... which possibly makes it extremely expensive 
from the start - since it is not available via mass production. Also - 
somewhere BrLPs facilities there is probably a "hot room" but you are unlikely 
to hear this admission at the demo. Mills would argue that depleted water 
should be affordable in the future due to mass production, or in any event the 
neutron activation is less of a problem in an industrial setting - but it is 
somewhat curious that this subject is generally avoided, even on forums. 
Admittedly, this is not a deal-breaker problem - given the realm of other 
risks... but...

OK, to move onto something more useful - the intended subject here is that 
"other" kind of heavy water.

This refers to light water where density increase comes NOT from deuterium  or 
from heavier oxygen isotopes but from a population where one or both of the 
hydrogen atoms is in the redundant orbital state (the hydrino state). This 
happenstance would be planned FROM THE START so that the net gain comes from 
forcing this denser species into an even lower Rydberg orbital. Mills is 
suspected of being disingenuous to claim that the process will not need to 
recapture dense hydrogen and reuse it.

It would be a more expensive proposition to obtain an advanced fuel from the 
start - which is nominally light water in which a natural population of dense 
hydrogen already exists, but it makes sense if Mills is correct on his theory. 
Even if the population of hydrinos is relatively low
(ppm) the energy gain could be well worth the effort... and there is probably a 
natural source in the solar corona.

Of special interest would be a putative fuel (which we can denote as
hydrino-water) which is harvested from the oceans. Think about it - the solar 
corona sends megatons of dense hydrogen to earth in the solar wind daily 
(according to RM) and it ends up in the oceans as it has for billions of years. 
Can this resource not be harvested? Another possible hydrino-water source for 
harvesting is the spent water from nuclear reactors which is also activated but 
that may not matter once Mills gets over his problem of denial of LENR.

In short, it is highly doubtful that this SunCell (TM) device "extracts energy 
from water" in the way that proponents have been lead to believe. 
It is highly likely that neutron activation is a problem. It is highly likely 
that the process is LENR, or stated more succinctly - that LENR and Mills are 
differing aspects of the same phenomenon which at some stage requires the 
densification of hydrogen.



Reply via email to