Jed,
It looks to me that Bob was repeating my comment. It is impossible to
be sure, one way or the other. that the E-Cat works, without having all
the data. You said I was calling you a liar because of this and stopped
replying to me.
If the instrumentation was so obviously useless on the 1 MW plant why on
earth did IH agree to the instrumentation recommended by the ERV and
even show potential customers around the plant saying how well it worked?
AA
On 2/18/2017 11:10 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
<mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Jed, You are backing yourself into an extremist position with
your latest comments.
Saying that an experiment failed is not extremist. Most experiments fail.
I don't believe that you or anyone else has enough data to
_prove_ that there was 0 excess heat in Rossi's attempt at a
contrived "GPT".
The instruments and configuration that Rossi used could not prove
anything. There might have been excess heat, but he would never detect
it. However, I.H. used better instruments and saw nothing.
XH in this long experiment may not be close to what Rossi
claims, but that is not the same as 0 XH.
There was no excess heat. That is what they say, and I am confident
they know what they are doing. Unless they are lying to me, they got
nothing. It is not hard to see the heat balance is zero within the
margin of error.
I believe at least Parkhmomov, Jiang, and Zhanghang have
demonstrated that there is evidence of XH in the inferred Lugano
fuel system.
I do not think so. I think they made mistakes.
In fact, MFMP's Dogbone replication suggests that there was XH
in the Lugano experiment - just not nearly as much as claimed by
the Lugano experimenters (JofCMNS v21).
MFMP has not seen any significant excess heat. In retrospect, there
were so many mistakes at Lugano I do not think it means anything.
Since this fuel system and experiment design came from Rossi, it
lends credence to the claim that Rossi does have _some_ working
technology.
I disagree.
Despite all the rhetoric, I don't believe that even IH believes
that Rossi has nothing . . .
You are wrong. They say he has nothing. I agree with their analysis.
It is possible he had something in the past, but he has nothing now.
It appears that the Lugano technology that Rossi gave to IH was
"throwing them a bone". It is a low power, high temperature
technology. I personally believe this works or I would not be
actively developing test systems for it.
You have no reason to think it works. There is no experimental
evidence for that.
I have seen Piantelli's lab, read his papers, and listened to
him speak. I believe he has working Ni-H technology.
Piantelli has nothing to do with Rossi. He does not believe Rossi.
Also, Piantelli has not been replicated, so there is no reason to
believe his claims . . . yet.
- Jed
