http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Lattice+Vibrations
If a crystal lattice has all of its atoms/molecules vibrating at the same frequency (or harmonic), then I assume the reason why we don’t observe crystals radiating is because it’s in all directions and cancels itself out in whatever ‘antenna’ is used. I still wonder how the gross/macro motion of magnetic fields within a slab that measures in inches withdraws energy from something vibrating at the molecular range – if not quantum level. I assume also that the only reason we can grow crystals that easily match the form of a single atom/molecule is because the emerging form ‘acts as one’. You start with a tiny cube of table salt and end up with a big one because it vibrates and attracts equally in all directions. Otherwise, we couldn’t expect that cubes randomly tossed into a corner would end up as a huge cube most of the time. Sorry, if I’m a bit behind you guys, I’m just trying to reason and visualize this stuff….. From: bobcook39...@gmail.com [mailto:bobcook39...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 11:26 AM To: Chris Zell <chrisz...@wetmtv.com>; vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE Brian— I also thought there might be a connection between the Manelas device and Dragone theory. Again the possibility of reversal of the 2nd Law of T/D is very interesting. One thought I had was the orbital spin quanta are involved since in a coherent system they are limited to changing one quanta at a time IMHO. This restriction may somehow effect the reversal noted above to create more order in the crystal structures (grains) weakly coupled in the Manelas device. Small phase changes of the crystals may constitute such reordering that leads to a nuclear transition of greater stability. The temperature differential is then used to make a useful voltage. Bob Cook From: Chris Zell<mailto:chrisz...@wetmtv.com> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 8:05 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE If I google “phonons as an energy source”, nothing in particular comes up. If we are identifying them as the likely source of excess energy within a barium/strontium ferrite structure, I would think that someone somewhere has thought about cohering them into useful energy. So, we create a particular motion that gives us a gain from ‘straightening out’ random motion…………..? From: Brian Ahern [mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com] Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 10:06 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE I am intrigued by the Dragone stuff. It seems very close to Manelas, which I thoroughly tested in2012. From: Chris Zell <chrisz...@wetmtv.com<mailto:chrisz...@wetmtv.com>> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 9:41 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE http://rexresearch.com/maccanti/maccanti.htm Giampaolo Maccanti -- alleged free energy generator<http://rexresearch.com/maccanti/maccanti.htm> rexresearch.com Energia Celeste S.R.L. 17 Seprember 1998 Abstract--- Electromagnetic device (100), particularly to be used as a generator, for example of ... As Dragone seems to be talking about an effect which appears during attraction, I wonder about the overunity claims of the Maccanti device. From: bobcook39...@gmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@gmail.com> [mailto:bobcook39...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:35 AM To: MJ <feli...@gmail.com<mailto:feli...@gmail.com>>; vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE Dragone discussed the idea of decreasing entropy (increasing order of matter) as a an effect of the magnetic device he described. That may include better nuclear order. Another interesting item is the assessment of the Dragone document. http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/Research/DragoneAnalysis.pdf Analysis of Leon Dragone's paper by William Alek<http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/Research/DragoneAnalysis.pdf> www.intalek.com<http://www.intalek.com> Analysis of Leon Dragone's, "Energetics of Ferromagnetism" By William S. Alek INTALEK, INC. November 2002 Version 5a Bob Cook From: MJ<mailto:feli...@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 3:25 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE Leon Dragone also observed the cooling effect related to magnetism: http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Sciences/Dossiers/EM/Leon%20Dragone%20-%20Energetics%20of%20Ferromagnetism.pdf Mark Jordan On 16-Feb-17 19:42, David Roberson wrote: When a hot object radiates IR into space the temperature also drops. Perhaps there is a low frequency form of magnetic coupling that can be encouraged to do a similar thing. According to my observations there seems to be a method available to convert energy among the different forms under most conditions. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Chris Zell <chrisz...@wetmtv.com><mailto:chrisz...@wetmtv.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com><mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Thu, Feb 16, 2017 3:02 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE If a specially shaped magnetic field can drop the temperature of an apparatus, shouldn’t we conclude that random motion (heat) is somehow being converted into directed, useful motion? That Maxwell’s Demon has been found?
