Hmmm... Didn't your program insist that you include all of the words in the
sentences that are needed?  :)  re-read below.

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Frank Znidarsic <fznidar...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> Look at the picture.  They predicted tug boat airplanes, painted floating
>> signs, boies as flight path markers.  They knew that air travel was coming
>> but they could only extend the existing technology to explain it.
>
>
> That is a great picture. But the person who painted it knew nothing about
> aviation. If you had asked aviators experienced with airplanes and
> dirigibles how the future might have looked, they would have given you a
> much more accurate description.
>
> In the 1950s many books and cartoons portrayed robots of the future as
> being similar to people, walking on two legs with faces and hands. John
> Bockris, who was a superb scientist and who know a lot about technology
> once ridiculed the notion of household robots dressed in tuxedos pouring
> wine. Why they would be dressed in tuxedos I do not know. Anyway, as
> everyone now knows most robots even in the 1950s and 60s did not look like
> people. We may eventually have mobile robots that resemble people or
> animals but the next ones to emerge will look like automobiles, because
> that is what they will be. Isaac Asimov once described a robot used to
> spelling and grammatical errors in manuscripts, in one of his I Robot
> stories. The robot looked like a person -- they all did. It used a red
> pencil to mark up a paper manuscript. The ability to use a pencil and do
> this would be far more advanced than any robot or personal computer. Yet
> Microsoft Word and other programs have been checking spelling and grammar
> effectively for over 20 years. That task is easier than Asimov imagined it
> would be. In 1978 I was working with minicomputers. I got a list of 120,000
> correctly spelled English. I wrote an effective spell checking program with
> it, along with a WYSIWYG text editor. I haven't had to worry about spelling
> since then. Some thing are harder to automate than we anticipated, but
> others are easier.
>
> - Jed
>
>

Reply via email to